Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416483›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Study protocol: Impact of quality improvement interventions on perinatal outcomes in health facilities-a systematic review.

Rejina Gurung, Nabila Zaka, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki, Avinash K Sunny, Jeevan Thapa, Hong Zhou, Ashish Kc

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Rejina GurungGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Nabila ZakaHealth Section, Programme Division, UNICEF, New York, USA.
Shyam Sundar BudhathokiGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Avinash K SunnyGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Jeevan ThapaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Hong ZhouPeking University, Beijing, China.
Ashish KcDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, MTC, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, 1 tr, Rudbecklaboratoriet: Dag Hammaskjölds väg 20, Uppsala, Sweden. aaashis7@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-4486
Nepal Development Research Institute · NPB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPPeking University · CNUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 5.8 million maternal deaths, neonatal deaths and stillbirths occur every year with 99% of them taking place in low- and middle-income countries. Two thirds of them could be prevented through cost-effective interventions during pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum periods. Despite the availability of standards and guidelines for the care of mother and newborn, challenges remain in translating these standards into practice in health facilities. Although several quality improvement (QI) interventions have been systematically reviewed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) group, evidence lack on QI interventions for improving perinatal outcomes in health facilities. This systematic review will identify QI interventions implemented for maternal and neonatal care in health facilities and their impact on perinatal outcomes. METHODS/

designThis review will look at studies of mothers, newborn and both who received inpatient care at health facilities. QI interventions targeted at health system level (macro), at healthcare organization (meso) and at health workers practice (micro) will be reviewed. Mortality of mothers and newborn and relevant health worker practices will be assessed. The MEDLINE, Embase, World Health Organization Global Health Library, Cochrane Library and trial registries electronic databases will be searched for relevant studies from the year 2000 onwards. Data will be extracted from the identified relevant literature using Epi review software. Risk of bias will be assessed in the studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized and observational studies. Standard data synthesis and analysis will be used for the review, and the data will be analysed using EPPI Reviewer 4. DISCUSSION: This review will inform the global agenda for evidence-based health care by (1) providing a basis for operational guidelines for implementing clinical standards of perinatal care, (2) identify research priorities for generating evidence for QI interventions and (3) QI intervention options with lessons learnt for implementation based on the level of needed resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42018106075.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal CarePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSystematic Reviews as TopicHealth care organizationHealth care workersHealth systemPerinatal careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31416483
PMCPMC6694558
OpenAlexW2969148252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.