Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416482›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Comparable type I interferon score determination from PAXgene and Tempus whole blood RNA collection and isolation systems.

Lovro Lamot, Iwona Niemietz, Kelly L Brown

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lovro LamotDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Iwona NiemietzBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Rm A4-145, 950 West 28th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Kelly L BrownDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. kbrown@bcchr.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-3582

Funding

Rare Disease Foundation 2779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveType I interferons (IFN) have important roles in many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and are a relatively new therapeutic target. Direct detection of type I IFNs has proved challenging, thus their presence is often inferred from the expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and calculation of an interferon score (IS). The objective of this research was to determine if the expression of six common ISGs and subsequent IS were comparable when RNA was derived from the Tempus and PAXgene whole blood RNA collection systems.

resultsWhole blood was obtained from ten healthy adults, incubated ex vivo in the absence and presence of recombinant human IFNα then divided into PAXgene and Tempus tubes. Despite reports of tube-specific patterns of gene expression, quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis revealed no significant differences between PAXgene and Tempus tubes in either the homeostatic or IFNα-induced expression of six ISGs (IFI27, IFI44L, IFIT1, ISG15, RSAD2, SIGLEC1). Overall there was a strong correlation in the IS between unstimulated (r = 0.92, p = 0.0005) and IFNα-stimulated (r = 0.71, p = 0.0268) samples derived from the PAXgene and Tempus tubes.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Specimen CollectionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHealthy VolunteersHumansInterferon Type IMaleReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNAYoung AdultInterferon Type IRNAInterferon scoreInterferon stimulated genesPAXgeneRNATempus

Identifiers

PMID31416482
PMCPMC6694656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.