Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416425›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Chiara Maj, Lorraine Poncet, Henri Panjo, Arnaud Gautier, Pierre Chauvin, Gwenn Menvielle, Emmanuelle Cadot, Virginie Ringa, Laurent Rigal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Which women go for screening?European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  2. The Impact of COVID-19 on Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of organization of care in GPs' prevention practice.Primary health care research & development · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara MajGeneral Practice Department, Univ Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Lorraine PoncetCESP (Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm U1018, University of Paris-Saclay, University of Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health Team, Paris, France.
Henri PanjoCESP (Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm U1018, University of Paris-Saclay, University of Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health Team, Paris, France.
Arnaud GautierSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Pierre ChauvinSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Department of Social Epidemiology, Paris, F75012, France.
Gwenn MenvielleSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Department of Social Epidemiology, Paris, F75012, France.
Emmanuelle CadotIRD - Hydrosciences UMR 5569, Montpellier University, Montpellier, F-34090, France.
Virginie RingaCESP (Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm U1018, University of Paris-Saclay, University of Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health Team, Paris, France.
Laurent RigalGeneral Practice Department, Univ Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. laurent.rigal@u-psud.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-2738
Université Paris-Sud · FRInserm · FRSanté Publique France · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn France, with the growing scarcity of gynecologists and a globally low and socially differentiated coverage of cervical cancer screening (CCS), general practitioners (GPs) are valuable resources to improve screening services for women. Still all GPs do not perform Pap smears. In order to promote this screening among GPs, the characteristics of physicians who never perform CCS should be more precisely specified. Besides already-known individual characteristics, the contextual aspects of the physicians' office, such as gynecologist density in the area, could shape GPs gynecological activities.

methodsTo analyze county (département) characteristics of GPs' office associated with no performance of CCS, we used a representative sample of 1063 French GPs conducted in 2009 and we constructed mixed models with two levels, GP and county.

resultsAlmost 35% (n = 369) of the GPs declared never performing CCS. GPs working in counties with a poor GP-density per inhabitants were more likely to perform CCS (odds ratio (OR) = 0.52 for each increase of density by 1 GP per 10,000 inhabitants, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.74). On the contrary, GPs working in counties with an easier access to a gynecologist were more likely not to perform CCS (OR = 1.06 for each increase of density by 1 gynecologist per 100,000 women, 95%CI = 1.03-1.10 and OR = 2.02 if the first gynecologist is reachable in less than 15 min, 95%CI = 1.20-3.41) as well as GPs working in areas with a poverty rate above the national average (OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.09-2.54). These contextual characteristics explain most of the differences between counties concerning rates of not performing CCS.

conclusionsSpecific programs should be developed for GPs working in contexts unfavorable to their involvement in CCS.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFranceGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPractice Patterns, Physicians'Socioeconomic FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical Cancer screeningDisparities in healthcare accessibilityGeneral practitionerPap smear

Identifiers

PMID31416425
PMCPMC6694570
OpenAlexW2968058803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.