Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416391›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2019

Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Merav R Senesh, David J Reinkensmeyer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merav R SeneshUniversity of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-1414
David J ReinkensmeyerUniversity of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOT-ASSISTED HAND MOVEMENT TRAINING AFTER STROKER01HD062744 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI David Jay Reinkensmeyer · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD062744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with hemiparesis after stroke appear to recover 70% to 80% of the difference between their baseline and the maximum upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) score, a phenomenon called proportional recovery (PR). Two recent commentaries explained that PR should be expected because of mathematical coupling between the baseline and change score. Here we ask, If mathematical coupling encourages PR, why do a fraction of stroke patients (the "nonfitters")

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalOutcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansModels, StatisticalParesismovementprojections and predictionsproportional recoveryrating scalesrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID31416391
PMCPMC6851474
OpenAlexW2968931355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.