Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416171›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Shorter Time to Full Preterm Feeding Using Intact Protein Formula: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre, Antonio Di Mauro, Margherita Fanelli, Manuela Capozza, Jennifer L Wampler, Timothy Cooper, Nicola Laforgia

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Special Issue: Preterm Birth: Research, Intervention and Developmental Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Elisabetta BaldassarreNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. mariaelisabetta.baldassarre@uniba.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0590-6664
Antonio Di MauroNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7052-9784
Margherita FanelliMedical Statistics, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0128-9745
Manuela CapozzaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Jennifer L WamplerMead Johnson Nutrition, Department of Medical Affairs, Evansville, IN 47721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-711X
Timothy CooperMead Johnson Nutrition, Department of Medical Affairs, Evansville, IN 47721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-1883
Nicola LaforgiaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITMead Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was carried out to evaluate enteral feeding advancement and tolerance in preterm infants receiving one of two marketed formulas: intact protein preterm formula (IPF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) for the first 14 feeding days.

methodsPrimary outcome was days to full enteral feeding (≥140 mL/kg/day). Per protocol analyses included the following: all participants who met study entrance criteria and completed study feeding (primary) and those who received ≥75% enteral intake from study formula (subset). Mothers were encouraged to provide their breast milk.

resultsOf the 65 enrolled (IPF:

conclusionsResults suggest shorter time to full enteral feeding and higher feeding volume achieved by study end in preterm infants receiving intact protein preterm formula versus extensively hydrolyzed formula.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightItalyMilk, HumanTime Factorsenteral nutritioninfantinfant formulapremature

Identifiers

PMID31416171
PMCPMC6720977
OpenAlexW2968648047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.