Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416148›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

"That is an Awful Lot of Fruit and Veg to Be Eating". Focus Group Study on Motivations for the Consumption of 5 a Day in British Young Men.

Stephanie Howard Wilsher, Andrew Fearne, Georgia Panagiotaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie Howard WilsherNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK. stephanie.howard@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3060-3270
Andrew FearneNorwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Georgia PanagiotakiNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

Funding

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young men do not consume enough fruit and vegetables, increasing their risk for future ill health. To understand what motivates their food choice, a novel conceptual framework that included key concepts from the theory of planned behavior and risk theory was developed. Thirty-four British men (18-24 years) took part in focus groups, where innovative visual qualitative methods provided insight into participants' motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption. Based on information from food diaries, participants were described as high (4+ portions) or low (up to 3 portions) consumers. Interviews were coded thematically into concepts and characteristics of the conceptual framework. Young men were generally unaware of the UK government's recommendation to consume 5 portions of fruit and vegetable a day and chronic health risks associated with low consumption. High consumers were motivated by perceived risk, perceived behavioral control, and health-conscious self-identity. They held internalized, holistic beliefs about diet and health, whereas low consumers' beliefs were externalized, based on physical appearances. Low consumers were driven by social influences to consume cheap, easily available convenience foods. The conceptual framework differentiated levels of fruit and vegetable consumption between the two groups and provided new information about young men's motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFruitMotivationNutritive ValuePortion SizeRecommended Dietary AllowancesVegetablesAdolescentAge FactorsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleProtective FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorSocial Determinants of Healthconceptual frameworkfruitpsychologyvegetablesvisual research methodsyoung men

Identifiers

PMID31416148
PMCPMC6723209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.