Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416115›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Design Features in Multiple Generations of Electronic Cigarette Atomizers.

Monique Williams, Prue Talbot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. e-Cigarette Tobacco Flavors, Public Health, and Toxicity: Narrative Review.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monique WilliamsDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Prue TalbotDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. talbot@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Research Training in Environmental ToxicologyT32ES018827 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Yinsheng Wang · 2010 to 2026
$5.3M
Metals in Electronic Cigarette Aerosol R01DA036493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI TALBOT, PRUDENCE · 2014 to 2018
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036493NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES018827NIH HHS #R01DA036493U.S. Food and Drug Administration #R01DA036493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of electronic cigarette (EC) atomizing units has evolved since their introduction over 10 years ago. The purpose of this study was to evaluate atomizer design in ECs sold between 2011-2017. Atomizers from 34 brands representing three generations of ECs were dissected and photographed using a stereoscopic microscope. Five distinct atomizer design categories were identified in first generation products (cig-a-like/cartomizer) and three categories were found in the third generation. Atomizers in most cig-a-like ECs contained a filament, thick wire, wire joints, air-tube, wick, sheath, and fibers, while some later models lacked some of these components. Over time design changes included an increase in atomizer size; removal of solder joints between wires; removal of Polyfil fibers; and removal of the microprocessor from Vuse. In second and third generation ECs, the reservoirs and batteries were larger, and the atomizing units generally lacked a thick wire, fibers, and sheath. These data contribute to an understanding of atomizer design and show that there is no single design for ECs, which are continually evolving. The design of the atomizer is particularly important as it affects the performance of ECs and what transfers into the aerosol.

Indexed as

AerosolsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignForecastingNebulizers and VaporizersAerosolsatomizercig-a-likeclearomizerdesign featurese-cigaretteelectronic cigarettemods

Identifiers

PMID31416115
PMCPMC6720609
OpenAlexW2968772601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.