ArticleiScience2019
Spatial Cues Influence Time Estimations in Deaf Individuals.
Article in iScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisensory temporal processing in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: implications for psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- How path integration abilities of blind people change in different exploration conditions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Hearing and Cognition in Childhood.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023Article
- Crossmodal plasticity in hearing loss.Trends in neurosciences · 2023Review
- Multisensory representations of space and time in sensory cortices.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Temporal visual representation elicits early auditory-like responses in hearing but not in deaf individuals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The power of vision: calibration of auditory space after sight restoration from congenital cataracts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Deprivation of Auditory Experience Influences Numerosity Discrimination, but Not Numerosity Estimation.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Cortical Activity Linked to Clocking in Deaf Adults: fNIRS Insights with Static and Animated Stimuli Presentation.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Auditory speed processing in sighted and blind individuals.PloS one · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual-Tactile Temporal Order Perception in Early Deaf Adults.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported a strong interaction between spatial and temporal representation when visual experience is missing: blind people use temporal representation of events to represent spatial metrics. Given the superiority of audition on time perception, we hypothesized that when audition is not available complex temporal representations could be impaired, and spatial representation of events could be used to build temporal metrics. To test this hypothesis, deaf and hearing subjects were tested with a visual temporal task where conflicting and not conflicting spatiotemporal information was delivered. As predicted, we observed a strong deficit of deaf participants when only temporal cues were useful and space was uninformative with respect to time. However, the deficit disappeared when coherent spatiotemporal cues were presented and increased for conflicting spatiotemporal stimuli. These results highlight that spatial cues influence time estimations in deaf participants, suggesting that deaf individuals use spatial information to infer temporal environmental coordinates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.