Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31415970›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2019

Alcohol use and consequences in matriculating US college students by prescription stimulant/opioid nonmedical misuse status.

Ty S Schepis, Shawn Acheson, Daniel Zapp, H Scott Swartzwelder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ty S SchepisDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. Electronic address: schepis@txstate.edu.
Shawn AchesonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel ZappEverFi, Washington, DC, USA.
H Scott SwartzwelderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University Hospital · USTexas State University · US

Funding

Supp: Effects of Adolescent Alcohol Exposure on Hippocampal Function in AdulthoodU01AA019925 · NIAAA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SWARTZWELDER, H SCOTT · 2010 to 2024
$5.0M
Prescription Drug Misuse Characteristics in Adolescents and Young Adults: Influence of School EnrollmentR01DA043691 · NIDA · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TY Stephen SCHEPIS · 2017 to 2026
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA019925NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUS college students have elevated prescription opioid and stimulant misuse rates, with frequent alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences (ARCs). To date, though, no research has examined relationships between opioid and/or stimulant misuse and alcohol quantity/frequency or ARC variables in college students.

methodsThe 2016-17 AlcoholEDU for College™, a web-based alcohol prevention program, provided data (n = 491,849). Participants were grouped into past 14-day: (1) no misuse; (2) opioid misuse only; (3) stimulant misuse only; and (4) combined misuse. Using multilevel logistic regressions, groups were compared on 14-day alcohol use odds, and among those with use, odds of any ARCs and specific ARCs (e.g., hangover). Multilevel negative binomial regressions compared group members with alcohol use on 14-day total drinks, maximum 24-h drinks and drinking days.

resultsAlcohol use and any ARCs odds were highest in the stimulant (odds ratios [OR] = 3.47 and 2.97, respectively) or opioid misuse only groups (ORs = 3.31 and 2.43, respectively), with the combined misuse group intermediate (ORs = 1.63 and 1.29; reference: no misuse). Mean 14-day drinks decreased from those with combined misuse, to those with stimulant misuse only, opioid misuse only and no misuse (8.22, 7.1, 6.67, and 4.71, respectively).

conclusionsCollege students engaged in 14-day stimulant and/or opioid misuse had higher odds of 14-day alcohol use, higher levels of alcohol use, and a greater likelihood of ARCs, versus students without misuse. These findings suggest that college students with any prescription misuse need alcohol screening, although those with poly-prescription misuse may not need more intensive alcohol interventions.

Indexed as

Alcohol Drinking in CollegeAnalgesics, OpioidCentral Nervous System StimulantsUniversitiesAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingCrime VictimsDriving Under the InfluenceFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMultilevel AnalysisPrescription Drug MisuseStudentsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidCentral Nervous System StimulantsAlcohol-related consequencesAlcohol useCollege studentsOpioidPrescription drug misuseStimulant

Identifiers

PMID31415970
PMCPMC6754780
OpenAlexW2950208581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.