ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2019
An automatic behavior recognition system classifies animal behaviors using movements and their temporal context.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autobehaver: An AI-Based Pipeline for Animal Behavior Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Segmentally repeated ventral nerve cord circuits drive different leg rubbing behaviors iniScience · 2026Article
- Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringeLife · 2026Article
- A spatiotemporal hypergraph self-attention neural networks framework for the identification and pharmacological efficacy assessment of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- High-throughput end-to-end aphid honeydew excretion behavior recognition method based on rapid adaptive motion-feature fusion.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Characterizing the structure of mouse behavior using Motion Sequencing.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- A study of animal action segmentation algorithms across supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning paradigms.Neurons, behavior, data analysis, and theory · 2024Article
- Article
- A pair of commissural command neurons inducesiScience · 2022Article
- Article
- Distinct movement patterns generate stages of spider web building.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- A hierarchical 3D-motion learning framework for animal spontaneous behavior mapping.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Dopamine modulation of sensory processing and adaptive behavior in flies.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Variation and Variability inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Quantifying behavior to understand the brain.Nature neuroscience · 2020Review
- Application of Spatio-Temporal Context and Convolution Neural Network (CNN) in Grooming Behavior ofInsects · 2020Article
- Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
- Recognition of Common Non-Normal Walking Actions Based on Relief-F Feature Selection and Relief-Bagging-SVM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals can perform complex and purposeful behaviors by executing simpler movements in flexible sequences. It is particularly challenging to analyze behavior sequences when they are highly variable, as is the case in language production, certain types of birdsong and, as in our experiments, flies grooming. High sequence variability necessitates rigorous quantification of large amounts of data to identify organizational principles and temporal structure of such behavior. To cope with large amounts of data, and minimize human effort and subjective bias, researchers often use automatic behavior recognition software. Our standard grooming assay involves coating flies in dust and videotaping them as they groom to remove it. The flies move freely and so perform the same movements in various orientations. As the dust is removed, their appearance changes. These conditions make it difficult to rely on precise body alignment and anatomical landmarks such as eyes or legs and thus present challenges to existing behavior classification software. Human observers use speed, location, and shape of the movements as the diagnostic features of particular grooming actions. We applied this intuition to design a new automatic behavior recognition system (ABRS) based on spatiotemporal features in the video data, heavily weighted for temporal dynamics and invariant to the animal's position and orientation in the scene. We use these spatiotemporal features in two steps of supervised classification that reflect two time-scales at which the behavior is structured. As a proof of principle, we show results from quantification and analysis of a large data set of stimulus-induced fly grooming behaviors that would have been difficult to assess in a smaller dataset of human-annotated ethograms. While we developed and validated this approach to analyze fly grooming behavior, we propose that the strategy of combining alignment-invariant features and multi-timescale analysis may be generally useful for movement-based classification of behavior from video data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.