Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31415845›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2019

An automatic behavior recognition system classifies animal behaviors using movements and their temporal context.

Primoz Ravbar, Kristin Branson, Julie H Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autobehaver: An AI-Based Pipeline for Animal Behavior Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Variation and Variability inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Primoz RavbarDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. Electronic address: Primoz.ravbar@gmail.com.
Kristin BransonJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA. Electronic address: bransonk@janelia.hhmi.org.
Julie H SimpsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. Electronic address: jhsimpson@ucsb.edu.

Funding

Sensory control of a motor sequenceR01NS110866 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SIMPSON, JULIE H · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Neural circuit motifs enabling sequential selection of motor programsR56NS102416 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SIMPSON, JULIE H · 2018 to 2018
$384k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110866NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS102416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals can perform complex and purposeful behaviors by executing simpler movements in flexible sequences. It is particularly challenging to analyze behavior sequences when they are highly variable, as is the case in language production, certain types of birdsong and, as in our experiments, flies grooming. High sequence variability necessitates rigorous quantification of large amounts of data to identify organizational principles and temporal structure of such behavior. To cope with large amounts of data, and minimize human effort and subjective bias, researchers often use automatic behavior recognition software. Our standard grooming assay involves coating flies in dust and videotaping them as they groom to remove it. The flies move freely and so perform the same movements in various orientations. As the dust is removed, their appearance changes. These conditions make it difficult to rely on precise body alignment and anatomical landmarks such as eyes or legs and thus present challenges to existing behavior classification software. Human observers use speed, location, and shape of the movements as the diagnostic features of particular grooming actions. We applied this intuition to design a new automatic behavior recognition system (ABRS) based on spatiotemporal features in the video data, heavily weighted for temporal dynamics and invariant to the animal's position and orientation in the scene. We use these spatiotemporal features in two steps of supervised classification that reflect two time-scales at which the behavior is structured. As a proof of principle, we show results from quantification and analysis of a large data set of stimulus-induced fly grooming behaviors that would have been difficult to assess in a smaller dataset of human-annotated ethograms. While we developed and validated this approach to analyze fly grooming behavior, we propose that the strategy of combining alignment-invariant features and multi-timescale analysis may be generally useful for movement-based classification of behavior from video data.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMachine LearningMovementAnimalsBehavioral ResearchDipteraNeurosciencesPattern Recognition, AutomatedTime FactorsBehaviorGroomingMachine learningNeuroethology

Identifiers

PMID31415845
PMCPMC6779137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.