Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31415589›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Advances in gene ontology utilization improve statistical power of annotation enrichment.

Eugene W Hinderer, Robert M Flight, Rashmi Dubey, James N MacLeod, Hunter N B Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eugene W HindererDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.
Robert M FlightMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-7788
Rashmi DubeyMaxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.
James N MacLeodMaxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.
Hunter N B MoseleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-5368

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
SAMPLE COREU24DK097215 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, HIGASHI, RICHARD M · 2013 to 2017
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-annotation enrichment is a common method for utilizing ontology-based annotations in gene and gene-product centric knowledgebases. Effective utilization of these annotations requires inferring semantic linkages by tracing paths through edges in the ontological graph, referred to as relations. However, some relations are semantically problematic with respect to scope, necessitating their omission or modification lest erroneous term mappings occur. To address these issues, we created the Gene Ontology Categorization Suite, or GOcats-a novel tool that organizes the Gene Ontology into subgraphs representing user-defined concepts, while ensuring that all appropriate relations are congruent with respect to scoping semantics. Here, we demonstrate the improvements in annotation enrichment by re-interpreting edges that would otherwise be omitted by traditional ancestor path-tracing methods. Specifically, we show that GOcats' unique handling of relations improves enrichment over conventional methods in the analysis of two different gene-expression datasets: a breast cancer microarray dataset and several horse cartilage development RNAseq datasets. With the breast cancer microarray dataset, we observed significant improvement (one-sided binomial test p-value = 1.86E-25) in 182 of 217 significantly enriched GO terms identified from the conventional path traversal method when GOcats' path traversal was used. We also found new significantly enriched terms using GOcats, whose biological relevancy has been experimentally demonstrated elsewhere. Likewise, on the horse RNAseq datasets, we observed a significant improvement in GO term enrichment when using GOcat's path traversal: one-sided binomial test p-values range from 1.32E-03 to 2.58E-44.

Indexed as

Gene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticFemaleHorsesHumansKnowledge Bases

Identifiers

PMID31415589
PMCPMC6695228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.