ArticlePloS one2019
Development of a high-throughput assay to measure measles neutralizing antibodies.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of measles IgG enzyme immunoassays (EIA) versus plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) for measuring measles serostatus: a systematic review of head-to-head analyses of measles IgG EIA and PRNT.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Correction: Development of a high-throughput assay to measure measles neutralizing antibodies.PloS oneArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measles virus is highly infectious and remains a leading cause of vaccine preventable deaths in children. Neutralizing antibody responses elicited by measles virus infection or immunization are a serological correlate of protection. We describe a high-throughput neutralization assay to improve surveillance for measles immunity. Measles virus-antibody mixtures were incubated on Vero cell monolayers and 24 hours later cell-lysates harvested and subjected to one-step SYBR green RT-qPCR to amplify a target sequence within the measles virus nucleoprotein gene. Neutralization endpoint titers were interpolated to determine the dilution that inhibited the relative amplicon copy number by at least 90% compared to the mean signal obtained in virus control wells in the absence of serum. Anti-measles virus and anti-measles hemagglutinin antisera specifically neutralized measles virus in the microneutralization RT-qPCR assay while pre-immune sera and sera raised against other viruses did not. The microneutralization RT-qPCR assay obeyed the Percentage Law for measles virus inputs ranging from 100-5000 TCID50/well. The linear range of the assay corresponds to measles antibody concentrations of 30 to 3000 mIU/mL. Bland-Altman analysis and two-way analysis of variance demonstrated that results obtained using the microneutralization RT-qPCR assay were comparable to those obtained using a plaque reduction neutralization test and correctly identified human serum samples that were seropositive (95% and 100%, sensitivity and specificity, respectively). Furthermore, these comparisons suggest that a concentration of 300 mIU/mL may be a conservative cut-point to use to identify individuals likely to be protected against severe measles disease when the endpoint is based on 90% inhibition of virus replication. Measles virus microneutralization RT-qPCR is a rapid, sensitive, specific, and robust assay for detecting measles neutralizing antibodies that may help to improve immunization strategies nationally and achieve measles elimination globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.