ArticlePloS one2019
rawMSA: End-to-end Deep Learning using raw Multiple Sequence Alignments.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Modern resources for intrinsic disorder predictions: protein language models, deep learning, meta-servers, and databases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- ESMDisPred: A Structure-Aware CNN-Transformer Architecture for Intrinsically Disordered Protein Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Machine-Learned Representations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Critical Assessment of Protein Intrinsic Disorder Round 3 - Predicting Disorder in the Era of Protein Language Models.Proteins · 2026Article
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- LoRA-DR-suite: adapted embeddings predict intrinsic and soft disorder from protein sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- An outlook on structural biology after AlphaFold: tools, limits and perspectives.FEBS open bio · 2025Review
- Accurate and Fast Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder Using flDPnn.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- DARUMA: a gateway to fast and easy prediction of intrinsically disordered regions.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Beyond AlphaFold2: The Impact of AI for the Further Improvement of Protein Structure Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- DeepGOMeta for functional insights into microbial communities using deep learning-based protein function prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Taxonomy-specific assessment of intrinsic disorder predictions at residue and region levels in higher eukaryotes, protists, archaea, bacteria and viruses.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Tutorial: a guide for the selection of fast and accurate computational tools for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Protein Structure Prediction: Challenges, Advances, and the Shift of Research Paradigms.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Protein intrinsically disordered region prediction by combining neural architecture search and multi-objective genetic algorithm.BMC biology · 2023Article
- DEPICTER2: a comprehensive webserver for intrinsic disorder and disorder function prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- CAID prediction portal: a comprehensive service for predicting intrinsic disorder and binding regions in proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decades, huge efforts have been made in the bioinformatics community to develop machine learning-based methods for the prediction of structural features of proteins in the hope of answering fundamental questions about the way proteins function and their involvement in several illnesses. The recent advent of Deep Learning has renewed the interest in neural networks, with dozens of methods being developed taking advantage of these new architectures. However, most methods are still heavily based pre-processing of the input data, as well as extraction and integration of multiple hand-picked, and manually designed features. Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSA) are the most common source of information in de novo prediction methods. Deep Networks that automatically refine the MSA and extract useful features from it would be immensely powerful. In this work, we propose a new paradigm for the prediction of protein structural features called rawMSA. The core idea behind rawMSA is borrowed from the field of natural language processing to map amino acid sequences into an adaptively learned continuous space. This allows the whole MSA to be input into a Deep Network, thus rendering pre-calculated features such as sequence profiles and other features calculated from MSA obsolete. We showcased the rawMSA methodology on three different prediction problems: secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility and inter-residue contact maps. We have rigorously trained and benchmarked rawMSA on a large set of proteins and have determined that it outperforms classical methods based on position-specific scoring matrices (PSSM) when predicting secondary structure and solvent accessibility, while performing on par with methods using more pre-calculated features in the inter-residue contact map prediction category in CASP12 and CASP13. Clearly demonstrating that rawMSA represents a promising development that can pave the way for improved methods using rawMSA instead of sequence profiles to represent evolutionary information in the coming years. Availability: datasets, dataset generation code, evaluation code and models are available at: https://bitbucket.org/clami66/rawmsa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.