ArticleMedicine2019
Identifying the superior surgical procedure for endometrial cancer: A protocol of network meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insights into endometrial cancer management: a comprehensive guide through multimodality imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic tumors, with a high incidence in developed countries. Although the overall prognosis is good, some women have invasive tumors, the risk of recurrence, and death is high. The common surgical methods used in EC are total-abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), total-vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and total-laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) including both conventional and robotically assisted.
methodsThe literature search was performed in The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be included. The search date is until June 2019. The risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed by 2 investigators according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Network meta-analysis will be conducted by R software.
resultsThis study is ongoing and the results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
conclusionThis network meta-analysis will provide clinical staff with current and reliable information on the best surgical approach for EC. Ethical approval is not applicable, since this is a network mate-analysis based on published articles. The protocol has been registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42019128094.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.