ArticleMedicine2019
Clinical analysis of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal cardiovascular malformations in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy: A CARE-compliant article.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with congenital heart disease: a meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Pooled it
- Live-Birth Incidence of Isolated D-Transposition of Great Arteries-The Shift in Trends Due to Early Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impacts of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases on outcomes.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal cardiovascular malformations is widely focused and screened, but the accuracy of screening is not satisfactory. In this study, we compared the types of congenital heart malformation, accompanying diseases and fetal outcomes in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy to clarify the advantage of early screening.From January 2013 to June 2018, 230 fetuses were diagnosed with congenital heart malformations using ultrasound method in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, and divided into 2 groups:the first trimester fetuses (group A) and the second trimester fetuses (group B). In addition, we collected and organized medical data of 347 cases diagnosed with congenital heart disease during 1998 to 2005 (group C). We compared the spectrum of congenital heart disease, associated comorbidities and outcome of fetuses diagnosed with congenital heart disease.There were differences in the types and incidence of cardiac malformations between the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. The number of cases of non-cardiac malformation, congenital heart disease with single ventricular circulation, fetal intrauterine death and premature pregnancy termination was significantly lower in the late stage (group A and group B) than that in the early stage (group C). More patients were screened for trisomy 21, 18, 13 syndromes and Turner syndrome in group A than group B (P <.001). More fetuses with a 22q11 deletion were screened in group B than group C.Early pregnancy screening using ultrasound diagnosis is very important for fetuses with congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.