ArticleMedicine2019
Pediatric minimally invasive surgery for malignant abdominal tumor: Single center experience.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the research on circular RNA in pediatric pancreatic tumors.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy among children with extra cranial solid masses at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the safety and usefulness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for malignant abdominal tumors in pediatric patients and analyzed the factors affecting the resection margin, operative time, and hospital stay of neuroblastoma (NBL) patients.We retrospectively reviewed data of pediatric patients who underwent MIS for malignant abdominal tumors from January 2011 to June 2017 at the Seoul National University Children's Hospital. Sex; age at operation; diagnosis; tumor location; operation-related data, such as operation time and transfusion; and follow-up data were reviewed. We divided patients into an excision group and a biopsy group. Detailed pathologic data were reviewed to analyze factors affecting the resection margin of NBL. Median value and range were calculated for all continuous variables. Mann-Whitney test and χ test were used as appropriate. P values of <.05 were considered significant.Thirty-four pediatric patients were included; 21 were boys. The median age was 4 (0.2-18) years. The most common diagnosis was NBL (17 patients; 50.0%). Three patients each were diagnosed with lymphoma, solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, and teratoma. The median tumor size was 3.4 (0.5-10.2) cm. The median operation time was 108 (55-290) minutes, and the median hospital stay was 5 (2-11) days. The number of conversions to open surgery was 4. There were no postoperative complications or mortality. There were 18 patients in the excision group and 16 in the biopsy group. Diagnosis and the number of patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy differed between the 2 groups. R0 resection of NBL was significantly higher in patients with stage 1 disease and those aged >2 years. There were no clinical factors influencing operative time or hospital stay.MIS was feasible and safe in pediatric patients with malignant abdominal tumors. R0 resection of NBL was related to age and stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.