Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31415040›Full record

Trial reportSexually transmitted diseases2019

Relationship Gender Equality and Couples' Uptake of Oral Human Immunodeficiency Virus Self-Testing Kits Delivered by Pregnant Women in Kenya.

Caroline J Vrana-Diaz, Jeffrey E Korte, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Lauren Richey, Anbesaw Selassie, Michael Sweat, Anthony Gichangi

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Women's Decision-Making Power and HIV/AIDS Prevention Practices in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline J Vrana-DiazFrom the Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Jeffrey E KorteFrom the Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Mulugeta GebregziabherFrom the Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Lauren RicheySection of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
Anbesaw SelassieFrom the Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Michael SweatDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Anthony GichangiJhpiego, Ring Rd, Arlington block, Nairobi, Kenya.
Medical University of South Carolina · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)TL1TR001451 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FEGHALI-BOSTWICK, CAROL A. · 2015 to 2024
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001451NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher gender equality is associated with many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preventive behaviors, including HIV testing. HIV self-testing is a relatively new testing technology that could assist with HIV prevention. However, there are no studies examining gender equality and HIV self-testing. We examined the associations between gender equality and couples' uptake of HIV self-testing among heterosexual couples expecting a child in central Kenya.

methodsThis analysis used data from a HIV self-testing randomized intervention trial among pregnant women attending antenatal care and their male partners. The primary exposures were gender equality (measured by the male partner's attitudes toward intimate partner violence, and the woman's report on her household decision making power), and the primary outcome was couples' uptake of HIV self-testing. Generalized linear mixed models framework was used to account for site-level clustering.

resultsIn comparison to male partners reporting high acceptance of intimate partner violence, couples with male partners reporting medium acceptance (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-5.63) or low acceptance (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-5.21) were significantly more likely to use HIV self-testing. Gender equality measured by decision making power was not associated with couples' uptake of HIV self-testing.

conclusionsThis study is the first of its kind to examine the association between gender equality and couples' HIV self-testing. This holds important implications for HIV self-testing as we strive to achieve the United Nations Programme on HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome goal that 90% of individuals living with HIV should know their status.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHeterosexualityHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID31415040
PMCPMC6727940
OpenAlexW2965606389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.