Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414558›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2019

Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa.

Francis B Kolo, Abiodun A Adesiyun, Folorunso O Fasina, Charles T Katsande, Banenat B Dogonyaro, Andrew Potts, Itumeleng Matle, Awoke K Gelaw, Henriette van Heerden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Polyphasic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francis B KoloDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-8864
Abiodun A AdesiyunDepartment of Production Animal Studies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9470-9421
Folorunso O FasinaDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Charles T KatsandeGauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Banenat B DogonyaroDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Andrew PottsAgricultural Research Council - Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
Itumeleng MatleAgricultural Research Council - Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
Awoke K GelawAgricultural Research Council - Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6368-5279
Henriette van HeerdenDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3577-1273
University of Pretoria · ZAOnderstepoort Veterinary Institute · ZAGauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development · ZAUniversity of the West Indies · TT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against Brucella in slaughter cattle at Gauteng province, South Africa and to characterize isolates of Brucella spp.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, un-clotted blood samples with corresponding organ tissue samples were collected from slaughtered cattle. Serological [Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect ELISA (iELISA)], molecular (PCR) and bacteriological methods were used to detect Brucella antibodies and Brucella spp. from 200 slaughtered cattle in 14 abattoirs.

resultsThe RBT revealed a seroprevalence of brucellosis as 11.0% (22 of 200) and iELISA confirmed 5.5% (11 of 200). The estimated seroprevalence from RBT and iELISA was 5.5% while RBT and CFT was 2.0% (4 of 200). Brucella melitensis (n = 6) and B. abortus (n = 5) were isolated from 11 cattle tissues (5.5%) as confirmed to species level with AMOS PCR and differentiated from vaccine strains with Bruce-ladder PCR. Seven of the 11 isolates originated from seropositive cattle of which five were biotyped as B. abortus bv 1 (n = 2) and B. melitensis bv 2 (n = 1) and B. melitensis bv 3 (n = 2).

conclusionsThis is the first documentation of B. melitensis in cattle in South Africa. The zoonotic risk of brucellosis posed by Brucella-infected slaughter cattle to abattoir workers and consumers of improperly cooked beef cannot be ignored.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaBrucellosis, BovineCattleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleMalePrevalenceSeroepidemiologic StudiesSouth AfricaAntibodies, BacterialabattoirsBrucella abortusBrucella melitensisBrucellosiscattleseroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID31414558
PMCPMC6868451
OpenAlexW2966936765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.