Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414505›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2019

Paper spray screening and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry confirmation for medication adherence testing: A two-step process.

Catia Costa, Cecile Frampas, Katherine A Longman, Vladimir Palitsin, Mahado Ismail, Patrick Sears, Ramin Nilforooshan, Melanie J Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catia CostaSurrey Ion Beam Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5792-3891
Cecile FrampasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Katherine A LongmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Vladimir PalitsinSurrey Ion Beam Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Mahado IsmailDepartment of Chemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Patrick SearsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Ramin NilforooshanSurrey and Borders Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, ACU, Holloway Hill, Chertsey, KT16 0AE, UK.
Melanie J BaileyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P001440/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R031118/1EPSRC strategic equipment EP/P001440/1EPSRC strategic equipment EP/R031118/1National Institute for Health Research CPMS ID: 37634National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) CPMS ID: 37634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePaper spray offers a rapid screening test without the need for sample preparation. The incomplete extraction of paper spray allows for further testing using more robust, selective and sensitive techniques such as liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Here we develop a two-step process of paper spray followed by LC/MS to (1) rapidly screen a large number of samples and (2) confirm any disputed results. This demonstrates the applicability for testing medication adherence from a fingerprint.

methodsFollowing paper spray analysis, drugs of abuse samples were analysed using LC/MS. All analyses were completed using a Q Exactive™ Plus Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. This two-step procedure was applied to fingerprints collected from patients on a maintained dose of the antipsychotic drug quetiapine.

resultsThe extraction efficiency of paper spray for two drugs of abuse and metabolites was found to be between 15 and 35% (analyte dependent). For short acquisition times, the extraction efficiency was found to vary between replicates by less than 30%, enabling subsequent analysis by LC/MS. This two-step process was then applied to fingerprints collected from two patients taking the antipsychotic drug quetiapine, which demonstrates how a negative screening result from paper spray can be resolved using LC/MS.

conclusionsWe have shown for the first time the sequential analysis of the same sample using paper spray and LC/MS, as well as the detection of an antipsychotic drug from a fingerprint. We propose that this workflow may also be applied to any type of sample compatible with paper spray, and will be especially convenient where only one sample is available for analysis.

Identifiers

PMID31414505
PMCPMC8047880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.