ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2019
Efficacy of Biofeedback for Medical Conditions: an Evidence Map.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05904860 (Effects of Backward vs Forward Gait Training With Auditory Feedback in Patients With Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Backward vs Forward Gait Training With Auditory Feedback in Patients With Stroke
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of biofeedback on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Pooled it
- Regional, multimodal, and opioid-sparing strategies after trauma: a review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- Introducing biofeedback-integrated laser therapy: a novel approach for enhancing scar treatment.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- The Integration of Psychophysiological Interventions with Psychotherapy and Pediatrics.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2025Article
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to temporomandibular disorder chronic pain: a narrative review.Pain management · 2025Review
- How to Limit Interdialytic Weight Gain in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: State of the Art and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Electromyography as an Objective Outcome Measure for the Therapeutic Effect of Biofeedback Training to Reduce Post-Paralytic Facial Synkinesis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physiotherapy as an Effective Method to Support the Treatment of Male Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) as an Innovative Diagnostic Tool in Mental Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Using Biological Feedback to Promote Health Behavior Change in Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Wearable Technology to Increase Self-Awareness of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Technology Needs among Health Care Workers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Biofeedback App for Migraine: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2021Article
- Biofeedback for Post-stroke Gait Retraining: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Directions in the Context of Emerging Technologies.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Mind body medicine: a tangible link between the gut and the brain.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Behavioral Medicine Methods in Treatment of Somatic Conditions.BioMed research international · 2020Review
- A Wearable, Extensible, Open-Source Platform for Hearing Healthcare Research.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiofeedback is increasingly used to treat clinical conditions in a wide range of settings; however, evidence supporting its use remains unclear. The purpose of this evidence map is to illustrate the conditions supported by controlled trials, those that are not, and those in need of more research.
methodsWe searched multiple data sources (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, and EBM Reviews through September 2018) for good-quality systematic reviews examining biofeedback for clinical conditions. We included the highest quality, most recent review representing each condition and included only controlled trials from those reviews. We relied on quality ratings reported in included reviews. Outcomes of interest were condition-specific, secondary, and global health outcomes, and harms. For each review, we computed confidence ratings and categorized reported findings as no effect, unclear, or insufficient; evidence of a potential positive effect; or evidence of a positive effect. We present our findings in the form of evidence maps.
resultsWe included 16 good-quality systematic reviews examining biofeedback alone or as an adjunctive intervention. We found clear, consistent evidence across a large number of trials that biofeedback can reduce headache pain and can provide benefit as adjunctive therapy to men experiencing urinary incontinence after a prostatectomy. Consistent evidence across fewer trials suggests biofeedback may improve fecal incontinence and stroke recovery. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about effects for most conditions including bruxism, labor pain, and Raynaud's. Biofeedback was not beneficial for urinary incontinence in women, nor for hypertension management, but these conclusions are limited by small sample sizes and methodologic limitations of these studies. DISCUSSION: Available evidence suggests that biofeedback is effective for improving urinary incontinence after prostatectomy and headache, and may provide benefit for fecal incontinence and balance and stroke recovery. Further controlled trials across a wide range of conditions are indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.