Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414274›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections versus cataract surgery: a 15-year cohort.

Nimrod Dar, Shani Pillar, Asaf Friehmann, Avner Belkin, Shay Ofir

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From colonizer to culprit: genomic and clinical insights into S. epidermidis from post-surgical endophthalmitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Endophthalmitis panorama in the Jerusalem area.International ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nimrod DarSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Nimrod.dar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-5811
Shani PillarSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Asaf FriehmannSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Avner BelkinSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shay OfirSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the clinical features, visual outcomes and causative organisms between endophthalmitis secondary to cataract surgery or to intravitreal injections (IVI).

settingMeir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

designRetrospective, non-randomized comparative chart review.

methodsMedical records of patients with proven or suspected endophthalmitis admitted to the Ophthalmology Department at Meir Medical Center 2/2002-2/2017 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics including presenting and final visual acuity (VA) outcomes, causative organisms and time to admission were assessed.

resultsAmong 84 patients in our study, 35 had preceding cataract surgery and 12 had preceding IVI. The post-cataract group showed a significant improvement in VA following treatment with a presenting and final VA (logMar ± SD) of (1.80 ± 0.54 and 1.39 ± 0.65, P < 0.01) as opposed to the post-IVI group (1.72 ± 0.26 and 1.81 ± 0.32, P = 0.692), while most patients in the cataract group exhibited some degree of VA recovery (70.96%). Patients undergoing cataract surgery were divided into two separate groups; those who underwent cataract surgery in a private center and those operated at a public center. Patients undergoing surgery at a private medical center showed improvement in VA outcomes following treatment (1.80 ± 0.57 and 1.13 ± 0.66, P < 0.01) as opposed to those operated on at our public medical center.

conclusionsOverall, patients with endophthalmitis following cataract surgery had better visual outcomes and were more likely to show a VA improvement following treatment when compared with endophthalmitis following IVI. Final VA outcomes of patients with endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed in a private center were better than those operated on and treated in a public medical center.

Indexed as

ForecastingVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCataract ExtractionEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinCataract surgeryEndophthalmitisIntravitreal injections

Identifiers

PMID31414274
OpenAlexW2968552173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.