ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2019
Decision-making for pediatric allergy immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a narrative review.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of immunogenic epitopes in major house dust mite allergen, Der p 2, via nanoallergens.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022Article
- Predictive Response to Immunotherapy Score: A Useful Tool for Identifying Eligible Patients for Allergen Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Review
- VALIDA project: Validation of allergyAdvances in laboratory medicine · 2020Review
- Pediatric Dysfunctional Breathing: Proposed Components, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been exciting progress in diagnosis and in the treatment of allergic patients. The objective of this review is to summarize the most relevant contributions in the past 10 years with a special focus on the pediatric population allergic to aeroallergens and provide the most relevant references and practical issues for the decision-making. Current guidelines on allergy diagnosis recommend a thorough clinical history as the first step, followed by allergen extract testing using an in vivo prick test and/or an in vitro specific IgE test. Molecular diagnosis is recommended when previous tests are inconclusive. In practice, the most important factors to decide the AIT treatment are the actual intensity and duration of the patient's symptoms and the availability of appropriate AIT products for the patient's sensitization profile at high allergen concentrations and with confirmed efficacy and safety from clinical trials. This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. The experts concluded that AIT is efficacious and safe for the treatment of allergic patients that is available for the most frequent aeroallergens.What is Known:• The prevalence of allergic asthma and rhinitis in children has increased in recent decades.• The efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy has been shown in multiple studies and systematic reviews.What is New:• This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. Recommendations of expert authors for the decision of the patients more suitable for allergen immunotherapy are included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.