Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414207›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Gender-related differences in side-effects and hemodynamic response to regadenoson in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Athanasios Katsikis, Elena Kyrozi, Vasiliki Manira, Athanasios Theodorakos, Julia Malamitsi, Virginia Tsapaki, Ioannis Iakovou, Vasilios Voudris, Genovefa Kolovou, Maria Koutelou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Left ventricular ejection fraction, myocardial blood flow and hemodynamic variables in adenosine and regadenoson vasodilator 82-Rubidium PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac pharmacologic stress: does the gender matters?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Athanasios KatsikisCardiology Department, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece. tkatsikis@gmail.com.
Elena KyroziNuclear Medicine Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Athens, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Vasiliki ManiraNuclear Medicine Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Athens, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Athanasios TheodorakosNuclear Medicine Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Athens, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Julia MalamitsiMedical Physics department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Virginia TsapakiNuclear Medicine Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Athens, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Ioannis IakovouCardiology Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Kalithea, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Vasilios VoudrisCardiology Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Kalithea, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Genovefa KolovouCardiology Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Kalithea, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Maria KoutelouNuclear Medicine Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Avenue, Athens, ZC, 176 74, Greece.
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center · GR401 General Military Hospital of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate differences in side-effects and hemodynamic response between men and women undergoing regadenoson-stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

methodsThe initial population of the study included 858 consecutive patients who underwent regadenoson-stress MPI at our institution. These patients underwent prospective assessment and classification of regadenoson-induced side-effects in six categories and recording of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) before and after regadenoson administration. From this initial population, after adjustment with 1:1 propensity matching using gender as the dependent variable and age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, presence of coronary artery disease, LVEF, baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and HR, on-going use of cardio-active medications during test, and abnormal MPI scan as independent variables, a population of 279 pairs of opposite gender was formed and studied.

resultsCompared with men, women had a significantly higher rate of any side-effect (71% vs. 58%, p = 0.002), chest pain (23% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal discomfort (20% vs. 12%, p = 0.01), dizziness (12% vs. 5%, p = 0.002), and headache (20% vs. 13%, p = 0.03) and similar rates of dyspnea and other side-effects. Women demonstrated a higher median HR-response compared with men (41% (- 8, 127) vs. 34% (- 5, 106), p = 0.001) while men demonstrated a lower median systolic BP response (- 3% (- 27, 48) vs. 0% (- 36, 68), p = 0.02) compared with women.

conclusionsGender is independently associated with a differential response to regadenoson with regard to overall side-effects and HR-response. These observations have the potential of important management and prognostic implications respectively.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingSex CharacteristicsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPurinesPyrazolesStroke VolumePurinesPyrazolesregadenosonGenderHeart rate responseRegadenosonSide-effects

Identifiers

PMID31414207
OpenAlexW2968141923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.