Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414204›Full record

ArticlePlanta2019

The biochemistry underpinning industrial seed technology and mechanical processing of sugar beet.

Michael Ignatz, James E Hourston, Veronika Turečková, Miroslav Strnad, Juliane Meinhard, Uwe Fischer, Tina Steinbrecher, Gerhard Leubner-Metzger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael Ignatz *Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-2074
James E Hourston *Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-8673
Veronika TurečkováLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-805X
Miroslav StrnadLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, 78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-794X
Juliane MeinhardKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Grimsehlstr. 31, 37555, Einbeck, Germany.
Uwe FischerKWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, Grimsehlstr. 31, 37555, Einbeck, Germany.
Tina Steinbrecher *Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-6029
Gerhard Leubner-Metzger *Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. gerhard.leubner@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-8713
Royal Holloway University of London · GBCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZKWS Saat (Germany) · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M000583/1ERDF CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827KWS SAAT SE direct funding from industry
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionSeed-processing technologies such as polishing and washing enhance crop seed quality by limited removal of the outer layers and by leaching. Combined, this removes chemical compounds that inhibit germination. Industrial processing to deliver high-quality commercial seed includes removing chemical inhibitors of germination, and is essential to produce fresh sprouts, achieve vigorous crop establishment, and high yield potential in the field. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. altissima Doell.), the main sugar source of the temperate agricultural zone, routinely undergoes several processing steps during seed production to improve germination performance and seedling growth. Germination assays and seedling phenotyping was carried out on unprocessed, and processed (polished and washed) sugar beet fruits. Pericarp-derived solutes, known to inhibit germination, were tested in germination assays and their osmolality and conductivity assessed (ions). Abscisic acid (ABA) and ABA metabolites were quantified in both the true seed and pericarp tissue using UPLC-ESI(+)-MS/MS. Physical changes in the pericarp structures were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We found that polishing and washing of the sugar beet fruits both had a positive effect on germination performance and seedling phenotype, and when combined, this positive effect was stronger. The mechanical action of polishing removed the outer pericarp (fruit coat) tissue (parenchyma), leaving the inner tissue (sclerenchyma) unaltered, as revealed by SEM. Polishing as well as washing removed germination inhibitors from the pericarp, specifically, ABA, ABA metabolites, and ions. Understanding the biochemistry underpinning the effectiveness of these processing treatments is key to driving further innovations in commercial seed quality.

Indexed as

Abscisic AcidBeta vulgarisBiochemistryGerminationPlant Growth RegulatorsSeedsTandem Mass SpectrometryAbscisic AcidPlant Growth RegulatorsAbscisic acid (ABA)Germination inhibitorsPericarp (fruit coat)Polishing and washingSeed processingSeed technologySugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris)

Identifiers

PMID31414204
PMCPMC6790189
OpenAlexW2968088083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.