Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414151›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2019

[Preoperative imaging for colorectal cancer: surgeons' perspective].

I Iesalnieks, A Agha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I IesalnieksKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Endokrine und Minimal-invasive Chirurgie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, München, Deutschland. iesalnieks_igors@hotmail.com.
A AghaKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Endokrine und Minimal-invasive Chirurgie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative radiological diagnostics in patients with colorectal cancer has several objectives. The diagnostic localization of the colonic tumor is essential for planning the resection. The radiologically suspected infiltration of neighboring structures may lead to the decision for neoadjuvant treatment. In patients with rectal carcinomas, the T and N stages, the distance to the circumference resection margin (CRM), and the penetration of the tumor into the mesentery must be determined. This crucial to determine whether the patient should undergo neoadjuvant treatment. Prior to the planned relocation of an upstream stoma, radiological diagnostics may be added to clinical and endoscopic assessment but should not be routinely used.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsSurgeonsHumansMesenteryNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingCircumference resection marginColon cancerRectal cancerTotal mesorectal excisionTumor diagnostics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.