ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the liver : How, why, what for?]
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring of colorectal cancer : Radiology as a key component].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical problemColorectal metastases are the most common malignant liver lesions. Imaging of the liver in patients with colorectal carcinoma is performed for early detection of liver metastases (CRLM) at the time of initial tumor diagnosis, for monitoring and follow-up in order to exclude or diagnose metachronous metastases. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsRadiological imaging includes primarily multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which play an important role regarding therapeutic management and assessment of prognosis. PERFORMANCE, ACHIEVEMENTS: Contrast-enhanced CT is broadly available and allows for rapid image acquisition including the possibility for complete tumor staging. MRI, on the other hand, is characterized by very good soft tissue contrast and has-especially with the use of diffusion-weighted imaging and administration of liver-specific contrast agents-the highest sensitivity for detection of metastases smaller than 1 cm. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The choice of imaging in daily routine is often dependent on availability and clinical question. Frequently, e.g. for assessment of resectability (extent of metastases, anatomic relation of lesions to critical structures), both modalities may be implemented in combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.