Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414071›Full record

ArticleScience robotics2019

Autonomous Robotic Intracardiac Catheter Navigation Using Haptic Vision.

G Fagogenis, M Mencattelli, Z Machaidze, B Rosa, K Price, F Wu, V Weixler, M Saeed, J E Mayer, P E Dupont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science robotics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Soft Robotic Delivery of Coiled Anchors for Cardiac Interventions.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Grand challenges for burrowing soft robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025
    Review
  13. Camera-on-tip endoscope forBiomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  14. Self-Steering Catheters for Neuroendovascular Interventions.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Modern Microsurgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Endovascular Detection of Catheter-Thrombus Contact by Vacuum Excitation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

G FagogenisBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
M MencattelliBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Z MachaidzeBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
B RosaICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
K PriceBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
F WuTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
V WeixlerBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
M SaeedBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J E MayerBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
P E DupontBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Cardioscopically-guided Valve Repair in the Beating HeartR01HL124020 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Pierre E Dupont · 2014 to 2026
$9.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While all minimally invasive procedures involve navigating from a small incision in the skin to the site of the intervention, it has not been previously demonstrated how this can be done autonomously. To show that autonomous navigation is possible, we investigated it in the hardest place to do it - inside the beating heart. We created a robotic catheter that can navigate through the blood-filled heart using wall-following algorithms inspired by positively thigmotactic animals. The catheter employs haptic vision, a hybrid sense using imaging for both touch-based surface identification and force sensing, to accomplish wall following inside the blood-filled heart. Through in vivo animal experiments, we demonstrate that the performance of an autonomously-controlled robotic catheter rivals that of an experienced clinician. Autonomous navigation is a fundamental capability on which more sophisticated levels of autonomy can be built, e.g., to perform a procedure. Similar to the role of automation in fighter aircraft, such capabilities can free the clinician to focus on the most critical aspects of the procedure while providing precise and repeatable tool motions independent of operator experience and fatigue.

Identifiers

PMID31414071
PMCPMC6693882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.