Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414031›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2019

Measuring Patients' Perceptions of Health Care Encounters: Examining the Factor Structure of the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.

Bridget L Ryan, Judith Belle Brown, Paul F Tremblay, Moira Stewart

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931978 (The Effect of a Consultation Dashboard on Patient Activation and Shared Decision Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05931978 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Consultation Dashboard on Patient Activation and Shared Decision Making

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Antonius HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B, Chronic Kidney Disease stage4ArmsCKD dashboard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness Questionnaire: Exploring the factor structure in French-speaking patients with multimorbidity.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bridget L RyanWestern University, London, Canada.
Judith Belle BrownWestern University, London, Canada.
Paul F TremblayWestern University, London, Canada.
Moira StewartWestern University, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven the ongoing desire to make health care more patient-centered and growing evidence supporting the provision of patient-centered care, it is important to have valid tools for measuring patient-centered care. The patient-centered clinical method (PCCM) is a conceptual framework for providing patient-centered care. A revision to the PCCM framework led to a corresponding need to enhance the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) questionnaire. The original PPPC was aligned with the components of the PCCM conceptual framework and developed to measure patient-centeredness from the patient's perspective. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of a revised version of the PPPC (ie, PPPC-R).

methodsEleven new items were added to the original 14 items. The modified questionnaire was administered to patients in primary health care teams in Ontario, Canada. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on a subset of 381 patients who had seen a family physician.

resultsThe initial proposed 4-factor model first tested with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not fit adequately. Exploratory factor analysis was therefore used as a second step to modify the model and to identify weak items. A 3-factor exploratory model with 18 of the original 25 items was converted into a final hypothetical CFA model that had a good fit (χ

conclusionsThe validity of the PPPC-R is supported by some congruence between the conceptual framework (the PCCM) and the statistical analysis (CFA), but there is not a 1:1 correspondence. The components of the PCCM represent conceptually what is important when teaching, researching, and providing patient-centered care, whereas the PPPC-R represents patient-centered care as it is experienced by the patient.

Indexed as

factor analysispatient-centeredpatient-centredness [sic]questionnairessurveys

Identifiers

PMID31414031
PMCPMC6675140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.