ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2018
Problems Experienced in the Second and Third Months After Discharge From a Heart Failure-Related Hospitalization.
Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family coping profiles in patients with chronic heart failure: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Supporting Physical and Mental Health in Rural Veterans Living With Heart Failure: Protocol for a Nurse-Led Telephone Intervention Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Health Literacy, Individual and Community Engagement, and Cardiovascular Risks and Disparities:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Patient Self-Management: Tools and Barriers.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018Article
- The Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-care: An Update on the Problem, Person, and Environmental Factors Influencing Heart Failure Self-care.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify high-priority problems experienced by individuals during the second and third month after discharge from an acute care facility for heart failure. This descriptive, exploratory study, an extension of a previous analysis that examined high-priority problems in the first month, comprised 19 participants who were assigned to an intervention group that received a randomized, 12-week-pilot coping partnership (COPE-HF) intervention. A trained research nurse provided the intervention, and participants used a standard list to identify high-priority heart failure-related problems. Quantitative and content data analysis was conducted. While the highest-priority problem continued to be managing their treatment regimens, the frequency of this problem lessened by week 12. Comorbidities emerged as a new problem in managing heart failure treatment and symptoms. Coping emerged as a new problem, as individuals with heart failure dealt with the impending morbidity of their diagnosis and how it would affect loved ones. Resource issues (ie, financial, social) became more prevalent for individuals with heart failure as potential and actual resources were depleted. Health providers should develop strategies to address these problems to improve outcomes in individuals with heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.