Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414015›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2018

Adapting Boot Camp Translation Methods to Engage Clinician/Patient Research Teams Within Practice-Based Research Networks: A Report From the INSTTEPP Trial and Meta-LARC Consortium.

Lyle J Fagnan, Matthew J Simpson, Jeanette M Daly, LeAnn C Michaels, David L Hahn, Barcey T Levy, Douglas H Fernald, John M Westfall, Donald E Nease

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Self-Management: Tools and Barriers.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lyle J FagnanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Matthew J SimpsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Jeanette M DalyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
LeAnn C MichaelsDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
David L HahnDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Barcey T LevyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Douglas H FernaldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
John M WestfallDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Donald E NeaseDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
University of Colorado Denver · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS022491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoot camp translation is a proven process to engage community members and health professionals in translating and disseminating evidence-based "best practices" models for health prevention and chronic illness care. Primary care practice improvement studies, particularly involving patient-driven change, as seen with self-management support (SMS), require engaged practice teams that include patients. Models of engagement such as boot camp translation may be effective.

methodsFour geographically dispersed practice-based research networks (PBRNs) from the Meta-LARC consortium engaged 16 practices to form SMS implementation teams involving a clinician, care manager, and 2 patients in each team. Our study adapted the boot camp translation model to engage the implementation teams in describing patient SMS, studying the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's SMS Resource Library, and adapting and implementing self-management tools at each practice site. Testimonials and quotes were collected across the 4 PBRNs through a facilitated brainstorming discussion and consensus model at each PBRN kickoff meeting to address the focused question, "What do patients want and need in order to self-manage their chronic illnesses?"

resultsTestimonials collected across the 4 PBRNs and participation levels indicated there was a high degree of engagement in the boot camp translation process across the PBRNs and the practices. Each PBRN developed themes expressed by patients and the practices regarding what patients want and need to self-manage their illnesses. Each practice selected, adapted, and implemented an SMS tool.

conclusionsResults suggest that adapted boot camp translation was effective in guiding multiple practices to implement self-management support tools for the INSTTEPP trial. Additional study of the adapted boot camp translation process in practice quality improvement and practice redesign studies is needed.

Indexed as

boot camp translationpractice-based research networksprimary careself-management support

Identifiers

PMID31414015
PMCPMC6676771
OpenAlexW2899280425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.