Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414013›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2018

How to Translate Self-Management Support Tools Into Clinical Practice: A Report From the INSTTEPP Trial and Meta-LARC Consortium.

Matthew J Simpson, Jeanette M Daly, Douglas H Fernald, John M Westfall, LeAnn C Michaels, Barcey T Levy, David L Hahn, Lyle J Fagnan, Donald E Nease

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient Self-Management: Tools and Barriers.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J SimpsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Jeanette M DalyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Douglas H FernaldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
John M WestfallDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
LeAnn C MichaelsDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Barcey T LevyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
David L HahnDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Lyle J FagnanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Donald E NeaseDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
University of Colorado Denver · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Implementing Networks Self-management Tools Through Engaging Patients and PracticR18HS022491 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FAGNAN, LYLE JAMES · 2013 to 2013
$495k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS022491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient self-management is an inevitable part of the work of being a patient, and self-management support (SMS) has become increasingly important in chronic disease management. However, the majority of SMS resources available in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SMS Resource Library were developed without explicit collaboration between clinicians and patients.

methodsTranslation of SMS tools derived from the library into primary care practices occurred utilizing boot camp translation in four different practice-based research networks (PBRNs). The typical model of boot camp translation was adapted for the purpose of the Implementing Networks' Self-management Tools Through Engaging Patients and Practices (INSTTEPP) study to develop SMS tools for implementation in the participating practices. Clinicians, clinic staff members, and patients were involved throughout the translation process. Existing resources from the SMS library were reviewed and adapted by each boot camp translation group to create tools unique to the patients in each network.

resultsThere was no preexisting resource within the library that was deemed suitable for implementation without modification. Each network adapted tools from the SMS library to create different products. Common themes emerged from each network's translation process that highlighted the importance of patient engagement in the translation process. Boot camp translation, in conjunction with PBRNs, can be implemented to adapt SMS tools for implementation in member practices.

conclusionsBoot camp translation with a combination of practices and patients can be implemented to facilitate a process of local adaptation that improves the local applicability of SMS tools in primary care clinics.

Indexed as

boot camp translationpractice-based research networkself-management support

Identifiers

PMID31414013
PMCPMC6676767
OpenAlexW2898988658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.