Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31414000›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2018

'No Pink Ribbons': How Women's Lived Experiences With Breast Atypia Inform Decisions Involving Risk-Reducing Medications.

Sarah L Goff, Reva Kleppel, Grace Makari-Judson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncertainty and Competing Priorities in Shared Clinical Decision-Making.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L GoffDivision of General Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
Reva KleppelDivision of General Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
Grace Makari-JudsonDivision of Hematology-Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBaystate Medical Center · US

Funding

Metabolomics Administrative Supplement: Disruption of parity-induced tumor suppressor pathways by xenoestrogen exposures during pregnancyU01ES026140 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI JERRY, D. JOSEPH, SCHNEIDER, SALLIE SMITH · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
Identifying Factors Associated With High Quality Pediatric Primary CareK23HD080870 · NICHD · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI GOFF, SARAH L · 2015 to 2018
$534k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD080870NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES026140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAtypical hyperplasia (AH) is associated with a nearly 4-fold elevation of lifetime risk for breast cancer, and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is associated with a 7- to 8-fold risk. Women with AH/LCIS make numerous decisions in the course of treatment, including whether to take a risk-reducing medication, an option relatively few women pursue. We explored women's decision-making processes through patient narratives in an effort to inform decision supports for AH/LCIS.

methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with 20 English-speaking women with AH/LCIS and no subsequent diagnosis of invasive breast cancer who had enrolled in the Rays of Hope Center for Breast Cancer Research patient registry between April 5, 2012, and March 31, 2016. Interviews were audiotaped, professionally transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using thematic qualitative content analysis.

resultsWe identified three major narrative themes: 1) experiences with medical care; 2) decision-making; and 3) making sense of AH/LCIS. Each major theme had several subthemes, many of which map onto existing decisional theories and heuristics. Subthemes included the impact of life context on diagnosis meaning, emotional responses, changes in self-concept and body image, and understanding of the risk-benefit of risk-reducing medications.

conclusionsThis narrative analysis offers important insights into how lived experience may influence decision-making for women with AH/LCIS. Decision supports that focus not only on analytic decisional processes, but also patients' subjectivities and decisional heuristics, could prove useful for women and their health care providers.

Indexed as

atypical hyperplasiabreastbreast cancer preventionpatient narrativequalitativeshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID31414000
PMCPMC6664336
OpenAlexW2800060710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.