ReviewTranslational pediatrics2019
The International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of neonates: evolution, progress and opportunities.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fenton Third-Generation Growth Charts of Preterm Infants Without Abnormal Fetal Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of phototherapy for jaundice in full-term newborns: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Cluster-randomized evaluation of neonatal intensive care unit quality improvement interventions in extremely preterm infants: secondary analysis of the INTACT trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Early-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Neonates of 22-28 Weeks' Gestation: An International Cohort Study.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic modeling of early clinical outcomes in very low birth weight infants: insights from a nationwide cohort on delivery room resuscitation, prematurity-related complications, and mortality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Methodological framework for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in high-risk infants: the NeoIPC surveillance core module protocol.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Preterm Infants Born at 22 to 23 Weeks' Gestation in 11 International Neonatal Networks.JAMA pediatrics · 2025Article
- Preterm Birth and Risk of Health Service Use, Morbidity, and Medication Needs at 5 Years.JAMA pediatrics · 2025Article
- Improving UK data on avoidable perinatal brain injury: review of data dictionaries and consultation.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The role of QI collaboratives in neonatology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Review
- International Variation and Trends of Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Very Preterm Infants.Neonatology · 2025Article
- Thermoregulation, incubator humidity, and skincare practices in appropriate for gestational age ultra-low birth weight infants: need for more evidence.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Review
- Reporting interhospital neonatal intensive care transport: international five-step Delphi-based template.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Variations in medical practice of retinopathy of prematurity among 8 Asian countries from an international survey.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Birth outcomes between 22 and 26 weeks' gestation in national population-based cohorts from Sweden, England and France.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022Article
- Neonatal Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants With Severe Congenital Heart Defects: An International Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Regional or national collaborative quality improvement initiatives in neonatology.Translational pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonates born very preterm (before 32 weeks' gestational age), are a significant public health concern because of their high-risk of mortality and life-long disability. In addition, caring for very preterm neonates can be expensive, both during their initial hospitalization and their long-term cost of permanent impairments. To address these issues, national and regional neonatal networks around the world collect and analyse data from their constituents to identify trends in outcomes, and conduct benchmarking, audit and research. Improving neonatal outcomes and reducing health care costs is a global problem that can be addressed using collaborative approaches to assess practice variation between countries, conduct research and implement evidence-based practices. The International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of neonates was established in 2013 with the goal of improving outcomes for very preterm neonates through international collaboration and comparisons. To date, 10 national or regional population-based neonatal networks/datasets participate in iNeo collaboration. The initiative now includes data on >200,000 very preterm neonates and has conducted important epidemiological studies evaluating outcomes, variations and trends. The collaboration has also surveyed >320 neonatal units worldwide to learn about variations in practices, healthcare service delivery, and physical, environmental and manpower related factors and support services for parents. The iNeo collaboration serves as a strong international platform for Neonatal-Perinatal health services research that facilitates international data sharing, capacity building, and global efforts to improve very preterm neonate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.