Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413873›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2019

Bi-directional drones to strengthen healthcare provision: experiences and lessons from Madagascar, Malawi and Senegal.

Astrid M Knoblauch, Sara de la Rosa, Judith Sherman, Carla Blauvelt, Charles Matemba, Luciana Maxim, Olivier D Defawe, Abdoulaye Gueye, Joanie Robertson, Jesse McKinney and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unmanned aerial vehicles and pre-hospital emergency medicine.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Possibilities of Using UAVs in Pre-Hospital Security for Medical Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Astrid M KnoblauchMycobacteria Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-4362
Sara de la RosaUNICEF Supply Division, Supply Chain Strengthening Centre, Interagency Supply Chain Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Judith ShermanUNICEF Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Carla BlauveltVillageReach Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Charles MatembaVillageReach Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Luciana MaximVillageReach Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Olivier D DefaweVillageReach Seattle, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abdoulaye GueyePATH Senegal, Dakar, Senegal.
Joanie RobertsonPATH, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jesse McKinneyGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Joe BrewGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Enrique PazUNICEF Madagascar, Antananarvio, Madagascar.
Peter M SmallGlobal Health Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Marcel TannerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Niaina RakotosamimananaMycobacteria Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Simon Grandjean LapierreMycobacteria Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drones are increasingly being used globally for the support of healthcare programmes. Madagascar, Malawi and Senegal are among a group of early adopters piloting the use of bi-directional transport drones for health systems in sub-Saharan Africa. This article presents the experiences as well as the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis) of these country projects. Methods for addressing regulatory, feasibility, acceptability, and monitoring and evaluation issues are presented to guide future implementations. Main recommendations for governments, implementers, drone providers and funders include (1) developing more reliable technologies, (2) thorough vetting of drone providers' capabilities during the selection process, (3) using and strengthening local capacity, (4) building in-country markets and businesses to maintain drone operations locally, (5) coordinating efforts among all stakeholders under government leadership, (6) implementing and identifying funding for long-term projects beyond pilots, and (7) evaluating impacts via standardised indicators. Sharing experiences and evidence from ongoing projects is needed to advance the use of drones for healthcare.

Indexed as

dronesmadagascarmalawiremotely piloted aircraft (rpa)senegalsupply chainuniversal health coverageunmanned aerial vehicles (uav)unmanned aircraft system (uas)

Identifiers

PMID31413873
PMCPMC6673761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.