Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413725›Full record

ArticleChild development perspectives2019

Placental Studies for Child Development.

Thomas G O'Connor, Richard K Miller, Carolyn Salafia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas G O'ConnorDepartments of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-5057
Richard K MillerObstetrics & Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center.
Carolyn SalafiaPlacental Analytics LLC.

Funding

Pre- and Postnatal Exposure Periods for Child Health: Common Risks and Shared MechanismsUH3OD023349 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Emily S Barrett, Richard Kermit Miller · 2018 to 2026
$15.9M
Pre- and Postnatal Exposure Periods for Child Health: Common Risks and Shared MechanismsUG3OD023349 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BARRETT, EMILY S, MILLER, RICHARD KERMIT · 2016 to 2024
$7.0M
Prenatal Anxiety and its Effects on Child DevelopmentR01MH073019 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI O'CONNOR, THOMAS G · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Human Placental Morphology, Function, and Pathology: Relationship to Environmental Exposures and Newborn and Child HealthR01ES029281 · NIEHS · INSTITUTE FOR BASIC RES IN DEV DISABIL · PI MILLER, RICHARD KERMIT, SALAFIA, CAROLYN M · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Persisting Effects of Prenatal Anxiety on Child OutcomesR01MH073842 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI O'CONNOR, THOMAS G · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029281NIH HHS UG3 OD023349NIH HHS UH3 OD023349NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073019NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on children's psychological and behavioral development readily incorporates changing biological models and techniques. In this article, we suggest that, in response to increasing evidence of robust influences of prenatal exposures on children's neurodevelopment and mental and physical health, developmental science also needs to consider the placenta's role in development. We argue why placental mechanisms are plausible targets in developmental science, and suggest initial and practical steps toward integrating placenta markers and mechanisms into research on child development.

Indexed as

developmental programmingneurodevelopmentPlacenta

Identifiers

PMID31413725
PMCPMC6693854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.