Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413696›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2019

Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Patient's Perspective.

Blaine T Manning, Daniel D Bohl, Michael L Redondo, Tad L Gerlinger, Scott M Sporer, Wayne G Paprosky, Brett R Levine

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Increasing Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers in Spine Surgery from 2013 to 2022: A Medicare Part B Analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blaine T ManningDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Daniel D BohlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Michael L RedondoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Tad L GerlingerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Scott M SporerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Wayne G PaproskyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.
Brett R LevineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Midlevel providers (i.e. physician assistants [PAs] and nurse practitioners [NPs]) are being integrated into systems of care due to the exponentially increasing demand for orthopaedic care. There is a lack of studies which investigate orthopaedic patients' perspectives regarding midlevel providers. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 538 first-time patients of four orthopaedic surgeons before their new patient visit. Content included patient perspectives regarding: optimal scope of practice, midlevel provider importance in physician selection, and reimbursement equity with physicians. Results: Of 538 consecutive patients, 415 (77%) responded. 57% were female with an average age of 63.9 ± 11.4 years. Most patients (68%) considered the training background of the surgeon's midlevel provider when initially choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. 34% of all patients perceived PAs to be more highly trained than NPs while 17% perceived the opposite. Patients had specific preferences regarding which services should be surgeon-provided: follow-up for abnormal tests (82%), initial postoperative appointment (81%), new patient visits (81%), and determining the need for advanced diagnostic studies (e.g. MRI) (76%). Patients had specific preferences regarding which services could be midlevel-provided: preoperative teaching (73%), minor in-office procedures (65%), long term postoperative appointments (61%), and prescriptions (61%). Patients lacked a consensus on reimbursement equity for midlevel providers and orthopaedic surgeons, despite most patients (78%) reporting the surgeon provides a higher-quality consultation. Conclusions: As health care becomes increasingly consumer-centric and value-driven, a databased utilization of midlevel staff will allow orthopaedic physicians to optimize efficiency and patient satisfaction. Surgeons may consider our results in division of clinical duties among midlevel staff since patients had specific preferences regarding which services should be physician-provided or midlevel-provided. Orthopaedic surgeons may also consider including the midlevel provider in marketing efforts, as most patients considered the midlevel provider's training background when initially choosing a surgeon and perceived PAs to be more highly trained than NPs. Patients lacked a consensus towards reimbursement equity for orthopaedic surgeons and midlevels, despite reporting that the surgeon provides a higher quality consultation. These findings are important as the midlevel workforce grows in response to the rising demand for orthopaedic care.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedic SurgeonsPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionPhysician AssistantsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesmidlevel providersnurse practitionerorthopaedic surgeryphysician assistant

Identifiers

PMID31413696
PMCPMC6604550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.