ReviewPatient preference and adherence2019
Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological distress, decision-making, and health behaviors among prostate cancer survivors with urinary incontinence: A scale- and symptom-level network analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Patient-Provider Communication and Treatment Decision-Making among Latino Men with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a natural language processing system to assess quality of physician communication in prostate cancer consultations.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Europe and implications for screening activities: population based study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Patient engagement in designing and publishing research in prostate cancer: a scoping review.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Men's perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Article
- Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10).Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.