Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413534›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Management of skin toxicities during panitumumab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Olivier Bouché, Meher Ben Abdelghani, Jean-Luc Labourey, Simon Triby, René-Jean Bensadoun, Thomas Jouary, Gaétan Des Guetz

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Supportive oncodermatology-a narrative review of its utility and the way forward.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivier BouchéDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Robert Debré, CHU Reims, Reims 51000, France. obouche@chu-reims.fr.
Meher Ben AbdelghaniOncology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg 67000, France.
Jean-Luc LaboureyOncology Department, Centre Hospitalier, Carcassonne 11000, France.
Simon TribyMedical Department, AMGEN France, Boulogne-Billancourt 92100, France.
René-Jean BensadounRadiation Oncology, Centre de Haute Energie, Nice 06000, France.
Thomas JouaryDermatology Department, Hôpital Saint-André, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33000, France.
Gaétan Des GuetzOncology Department, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny 93000, France.
Hôpital Saint-André · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is associated with skin adverse events not previously reported with conventional chemotherapy. Prophylactic actions are recommended, but routine clinical management of these toxicities and their impact on quality of life remain unknown.

aimTo assess the dermatological toxicities reported after panitumumab initiation, their impact on the quality of life and the clinical practices for their management.

methodsPatients included in this prospective multicenter observational study were over 18 years of age and began treatment with panitumumab for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The incidence of dermatological toxicities, clinical practices for their management and impact on quality of life were recorded during a 6-mo follow-up.

resultsOverall, 229 patients (males, 57.6%; mean age, 66.2 years) were included. At day 15, 59.3% of patients had dermatological toxicity; the rate peaked at month 2 (74.7%) and decreased at month 6 (46.5%). The most frequent dermatological toxicities were rash/acneiform rash, xerosis and skin cracks. At least one preventive treatment was administered to 65.9% of patients (oral antibiotics, 84.1%; emollients, 75.5%; both, 62.9%). The rates of patients who received at least one curative treatment peaked at month 2 (63.4%) and decreased at month 6 (44.8%). The impact of the dermatological toxicities on quality of life was limited as assessed with Dermatology Life Quality Index scores and inconvenience visual analogic scale score. The rates of topical corticosteroids administration and visits to specialists were low.

conclusionThe rates of the different skin toxicities peaked at various times and were improved at the end of follow-up. Nevertheless, their clinical management could be optimized with a better adherence to current recommendations. The impact of skin toxicities on patient's quality of life appeared to be limited.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalColorectal NeoplasmsDrug EruptionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPanitumumabProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalKRAS protein, humanPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorsMetastatic colorectal cancerPanitumumabQuality of lifeSkin toxicity

Identifiers

PMID31413534
PMCPMC6689814
OpenAlexW2966407525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.