ArticleScientific reports2019
A Kriging-Based Approach to Autonomous Experimentation with Applications to X-Ray Scattering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Unified Autonomous Scattering Experiments: A Cross-Facility Case Study at ALS and PETRA III.Photon science · 2026Article
- Adaptive X-ray imaging with reinforcement learning.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Data selection strategies for minimizing measurement time in materials characterization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EcoBOT: an AI/ML enabled automated phenotyping capability for model plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Advancing Rare-Earth (4ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024Article
- Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Superlative mechanical energy absorbing efficiency discovered through self-driving lab-human partnership.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Bayesian active learning with model selection for spectral experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive scale-bridging simulations through active learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Demonstration of an AI-driven workflow for autonomous high-resolution scanning microscopy.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Active learning-assisted neutron spectroscopy with log-Gaussian processes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Autonomous scanning probe microscopy with hypothesis learning: Exploring the physics of domain switching in ferroelectric materials.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Autonomous discovery of emergent morphologies in directed self-assembly of block copolymer blends.Science advances · 2023Article
- The case for data science in experimental chemistry: examples and recommendations.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2022Review
- Using simulation to accelerate autonomous experimentation: A case study using mechanics.iScience · 2021Article
- On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern scientific instruments are acquiring data at ever-increasing rates, leading to an exponential increase in the size of data sets. Taking full advantage of these acquisition rates will require corresponding advancements in the speed and efficiency of data analytics and experimental control. A significant step forward would come from automatic decision-making methods that enable scientific instruments to autonomously explore scientific problems-that is, to intelligently explore parameter spaces without human intervention, selecting high-value measurements to perform based on the continually growing experimental data set. Here, we develop such an autonomous decision-making algorithm that is physics-agnostic, generalizable, and operates in an abstract multi-dimensional parameter space. Our approach relies on constructing a surrogate model that fits and interpolates the available experimental data, and is continuously refined as more data is gathered. The distribution and correlation of the data is used to generate a corresponding uncertainty across the surrogate model. By suggesting follow-up measurements in regions of greatest uncertainty, the algorithm maximally increases knowledge with each added measurement. This procedure is applied repeatedly, with the algorithm iteratively reducing model error and thus efficiently sampling the parameter space with each new measurement that it requests. We validate the method using synthetic data, demonstrating that it converges to faithful replica of test functions more rapidly than competing methods, and demonstrate the viability of the approach in an experimental context by using it to direct autonomous small-angle (SAXS) and grazing-incidence small-angle (GISAXS) x-ray scattering experiments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.