Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413339›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A Kriging-Based Approach to Autonomous Experimentation with Applications to X-Ray Scattering.

Marcus M Noack, Kevin G Yager, Masafumi Fukuto, Gregory S Doerk, Ruipeng Li, James A Sethian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptive X-ray imaging with reinforcement learning.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advancing Rare-Earth (4ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcus M NoackThe Center for Advanced Mathematics for Energy Research Applications (CAMERA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. MarcusNoack@lbl.gov.
Kevin G YagerCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA. kyager@bnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-2513
Masafumi FukutoNational Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA. fukuto@bnl.gov.
Gregory S DoerkCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-2047
Ruipeng LiNational Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA.
James A SethianThe Center for Advanced Mathematics for Energy Research Applications (CAMERA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern scientific instruments are acquiring data at ever-increasing rates, leading to an exponential increase in the size of data sets. Taking full advantage of these acquisition rates will require corresponding advancements in the speed and efficiency of data analytics and experimental control. A significant step forward would come from automatic decision-making methods that enable scientific instruments to autonomously explore scientific problems-that is, to intelligently explore parameter spaces without human intervention, selecting high-value measurements to perform based on the continually growing experimental data set. Here, we develop such an autonomous decision-making algorithm that is physics-agnostic, generalizable, and operates in an abstract multi-dimensional parameter space. Our approach relies on constructing a surrogate model that fits and interpolates the available experimental data, and is continuously refined as more data is gathered. The distribution and correlation of the data is used to generate a corresponding uncertainty across the surrogate model. By suggesting follow-up measurements in regions of greatest uncertainty, the algorithm maximally increases knowledge with each added measurement. This procedure is applied repeatedly, with the algorithm iteratively reducing model error and thus efficiently sampling the parameter space with each new measurement that it requests. We validate the method using synthetic data, demonstrating that it converges to faithful replica of test functions more rapidly than competing methods, and demonstrate the viability of the approach in an experimental context by using it to direct autonomous small-angle (SAXS) and grazing-incidence small-angle (GISAXS) x-ray scattering experiments.

Identifiers

PMID31413339
PMCPMC6694190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.