Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413319›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

The rough sound of salience enhances aversion through neural synchronisation.

Luc H Arnal, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Laurent Spinelli, Anne-Lise Giraud, Pierre Mégevand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Fronto-temporal Delta-gamma Imbalance as a Neural Correlate of Hyperacusis in Tinnitus: An Exploratory EEG Study.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acoustic estimation of voice roughness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Vocal communication and perception of pain in childbirth vocalizations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spatiotemporal Mapping of Auditory Onsets during Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luc H ArnalDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Geneva - Biotech Campus, Geneva 7, CH-1202, Switzerland. luc.arnal@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-6497
Andreas KleinschmidtDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva - HUG, Geneva 14, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Laurent SpinelliDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva - HUG, Geneva 14, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Anne-Lise GiraudDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Geneva - Biotech Campus, Geneva 7, CH-1202, Switzerland.
Pierre MégevandDepartment of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Geneva - Biotech Campus, Geneva 7, CH-1202, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-547X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being able to produce sounds that capture attention and elicit rapid reactions is the prime goal of communication. One strategy, exploited by alarm signals, consists in emitting fast but perceptible amplitude modulations in the roughness range (30-150 Hz). Here, we investigate the perceptual and neural mechanisms underlying aversion to such temporally salient sounds. By measuring subjective aversion to repetitive acoustic transients, we identify a nonlinear pattern of aversion restricted to the roughness range. Using human intracranial recordings, we show that rough sounds do not merely affect local auditory processes but instead synchronise large-scale, supramodal, salience-related networks in a steady-state, sustained manner. Rough sounds synchronise activity throughout superior temporal regions, subcortical and cortical limbic areas, and the frontal cortex, a network classically involved in aversion processing. This pattern correlates with subjective aversion in all these regions, consistent with the hypothesis that roughness enhances auditory aversion through spreading of neural synchronisation.

Indexed as

AttentionSoundAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectrocorticographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31413319
PMCPMC6694125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.