ArticleScientific reports2019
The influence of the chosen in vitro bone simulation model on intraosseous temperatures and drilling times.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heat generation of autologous bone harvesting drills: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heat generation during osteotomy performed with ultrasonic insert versus rotary instrument in bovine femur: ex vivo comparison.Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL · 2025Article
- Mechanical and thermal efficiency of a single drill system for bone-anchored hearing implants.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy: Conventional, Single, and Osseodensification Drilling.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Correlation Between Implant Stability Quotient and Percussion Sound Frequency.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Thermographic analysis of perforations in polyurethane blocks performed with experimental conical drill bit in comparison to conventional orthopedic drill bit: a preliminary study.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- A Study on the Biofilm Removal Efficacy of a Bioelectric Toothbrush.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Heat Generation During Initial Osteotomy for Implant Site Preparation: An In Vitro Measurement Study.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023Article
- Heat Accumulation in Implant Inter-Osteotomy Areas-An Experimental In Vitro Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Article
- Developments in data science solutions for carnivore tooth pit classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Biomechanical properties of the bone during implant placement.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Surgical Drill Bit Design and Thermomechanical Damage in Bone Drilling: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Review
- Autonomous Robotic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Imaging for Monitoring of COVID-19-Induced Pulmonary Diseases.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Low-Density (10 and 20 pcf) Polyurethane Foam Blocks: Conical vs Cylindrical Implants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no consensus about the most suitable in vitro simulating material investigating heat generation during bone preparation. The aim was to compare heat increases and drilling times of bone removals in different bone simulating materials and to compare them to fresh human cadaver bone. A cavity was drilled in the following samples: (1) bovine rib; (2) pig rib; (3) 20 PCF (lb/ft
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.