Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Rumen bacterial community responses to DPA, EPA and DHA in cattle and sheep: A comparative in vitro study.

D Carreño, P G Toral, E Pinloche, A Belenguer, D R Yáñez-Ruiz, G Hervás, N R McEwan, C J Newbold, P Frutos

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Low n-3/High n-6 Flaxseed andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tannin in Ruminant Nutrition: Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D CarreñoInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain.
P G ToralInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain. pablo.toral@csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1913-7707
E PinlocheInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Animal and Microbial Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3EB, United Kingdom.
A BelenguerInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9186-3463
D R Yáñez-RuizEstación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
G HervásInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-7459
N R McEwanInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Animal and Microbial Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3EB, United Kingdom.
C J NewboldInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Animal and Microbial Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3EB, United Kingdom.
P FrutosInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Finca Marzanas s/n, 24346 Grulleros, León, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-5094
Aberystwyth University · GBInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña · ESEstación Experimental del Zaidín · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of marine lipids as modulators of ruminal biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated fatty acids may be explained by the effects of their n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) on the bacterial community. However, the impact of individual PUFA has barely been examined, and it is uncertain which bacteria are truly involved in biohydrogenation. In addition, despite interspecies differences in rumen bacterial composition, we are not aware of any direct comparison of bovine and ovine responses to dietary PUFA. Therefore, rumen fluid from cannulated cattle and sheep were used as inocula to examine in vitro the effect of 20:5n-3 (EPA), 22:5n-3 (DPA), and 22:6n-3 (DHA) on the bacterial community. Amplicon 16 S rRNA sequencing suggested that EPA and DHA had a greater contribution to the action of marine lipids than DPA both in cattle and sheep. Certain effects were exclusive to each ruminant species, which underlines the complexity of rumen microbial responses to dietary fatty acids. Based on changes in bacterial abundance, Barnesiella, Prevotella, Paraprevotella, Hallela, Anaerovorax, Succiniclasticum, Ruminococcus and Ruminobacter may be involved in the ruminal response in biohydrogenation to the addition of marine lipids, but further research is necessary to confirm their actual role in ruminal lipid metabolism.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBiodiversityCattleDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, UnsaturatedPhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenSheepDocosahexaenoic Acidsdocosapentaenoic acidEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, UnsaturatedRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31413283
PMCPMC6694141
OpenAlexW2968347587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.