Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413280›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Effect of mechanically stimulated saliva on initial human dental biofilm formation.

Taichi Inui, Robert J Palmer, Nehal Shah, Wei Li, John O Cisar, Christine D Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Characteristics and Relevance of OralJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Amylases: Biofilm Inducer or Biofilm Inhibitor?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Nutrients · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taichi InuiMars-Wrigley Confectionery, Chicago, IL, 60642, USA.
Robert J PalmerNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Nehal ShahNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Wei LiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
John O CisarNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Christine D WuDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. chriswu@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-7108
National Institutes of Health · USIllinois College · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of mechanically stimulated saliva on initial bacterial colonization. Interaction between oral bacteria and both unstimulated and stimulated saliva was examined in vitro by laying labeled bacteria over SDS-PAGE-separated salivary proteins. The effects of chewing on in vivo biofilm, microbial composition, and spatial arrangement were examined in two human volunteers using an intraoral stent containing retrievable enamel chips. In vitro experiments showed that bacterial binding to proteins from stimulated saliva was lower than that to proteins from unstimulated saliva. Lack of binding activity was noted with Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei. Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray (HOMIM) analyses revealed a consistent chewing-related increase in the binding of Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus gordonii. Immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrated the presence of multi-species colonies and cells bearing different serotypes of the coaggregation-mediating streptococcal cell-surface receptor polysaccharides (RPS). Differences in bacterial colonization were noted between the two volunteers, while the type 4 RPS-reactive serotype was absent in one volunteer. Cells reacting with antibody against Rothia or Haemophilus were prominent in the early biofilm. While analysis of the data obtained demonstrated inter-individual variations in both in vitro and in vivo bacterial binding patterns, stimulating saliva with multiple orosensory stimuli may modulate oral bacterial colonization of tooth surfaces.

Indexed as

BiofilmsSalivaHumansMouthStreptococcus

Identifiers

PMID31413280
PMCPMC6694102
OpenAlexW2968995628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.