Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413199›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Single-cell RNA-seq identifies a reversible mesodermal activation in abnormally specified epithelia of p63 EEC syndrome.

Eduardo Soares, Quan Xu, Qingqing Li, Jieqiong Qu, Yuxuan Zheng, Henriette H M Raeven, Karina O Brandao, Isabelle Petit, Willem M R van den Akker, Simon J van Heeringen and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR-Cas9‒Based Genomic Engineering in Keratinocytes: From Technology to Application.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Identification of a Novel Variant ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eduardo SoaresDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Quan XuDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Qingqing LiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China.
Jieqiong QuDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yuxuan ZhengBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China.
Henriette H M RaevenDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karina O BrandaoDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Isabelle PetitHôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, U976, INSERM, F-75010 Paris, France.
Willem M R van den AkkerDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon J van HeeringenDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Daniel AberdamHôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, U976, INSERM, F-75010 Paris, France.
Fuchou TangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China; tangfuchou@pku.edu.cn j.zhou@science.ru.nl.
Huiqing ZhouDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; tangfuchou@pku.edu.cn j.zhou@science.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2434-3986
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLPeking University · CNInserm · FRMinistry of Education · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in transcription factor p63 are associated with developmental disorders that manifest defects in stratified epithelia including the epidermis. The underlying cellular and molecular mechanism is however not yet understood. We established an epidermal commitment model using human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and characterized differentiation defects of iPSCs derived from ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, and cleft lip/palate (EEC) syndrome patients carrying p63 mutations. Transcriptome analyses revealed stepwise cell fate transitions during epidermal commitment: Specification from multipotent simple epithelium to basal stratified epithelia and ultimately to the mature epidermal fate. Differentiation defects of EEC iPSCs caused by p63 mutations occurred during the specification switch from the simple epithelium to the basal-stratified epithelial fate. Single-cell transcriptome and pseudotime analyses of cell states identified mesodermal activation that was associated with the deviated commitment route of EEC iPSCs. Integrated analyses of differentially regulated genes and p63-dependent dynamic genomic enhancers during epidermal commitment suggest that p63 directly controls epidermal gene activation at the specification switch and has an indirect effect on mesodermal gene repression. Importantly, inhibitors of mesodermal induction enhanced epidermal commitment of EEC iPSCs. Our findings demonstrate that p63 is required for specification of stratified epithelia, and that epidermal commitment defects caused by p63 mutations can be reversed by repressing mesodermal induction. This study provides insights into disease mechanisms underlying stratified epithelial defects caused by p63 mutations and suggests potential therapeutic strategies for the disease.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateEctodermal DysplasiaEpidermisEpitheliumGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunohistochemistryInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKeratinocytesMutationSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor ProteinsTP63 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteinscell fate commitmentEECp63single-cell RNA-seqstratified epithelia

Identifiers

PMID31413199
PMCPMC6717277
OpenAlexW2968269707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.