Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31413159›Full record

ArticleBMJ sexual & reproductive health2019

Utilisation of second-trimester spontaneous and induced abortion services in public hospitals in Mexico, 2007-2015.

Lily T Alexander, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Biani Saavedra-Avendaño, Raffaela Schiavon, Noe Maldonado Rueda, Bernardo Hernández, Alison L Drake, Blair G Darney

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Con la ley y sin la ley/With and without the law: Utilization of abortion services and case fatality in Mexico, 2000-2016.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lily T AlexanderDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-7816
Evelyn Fuentes-RiveraNational Institute of Public Health (INSP), Center for Health Systems Research (CISS), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-6133
Biani Saavedra-AvendañoCentro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-4458
Raffaela SchiavonIndependent Consultant, Mexico City, Mexico.
Noe Maldonado RuedaDepartment of Environmental Health Exposure, Epidemiology & Risk Program, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Bernardo HernándezInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alison L DrakeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-7706
Blair G DarneyObstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA darneyb@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-028X
University of Washington · USCentro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas · MXHarvard University · USInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Reproductive care in the safety net: Women's health after Affordable Care Act implementation (EVERYWOMAN)R01HS025155 · AHRQ · OCHIN, INC. · PI COTTRELL, ERIKA K. BARTH · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Optimizing repeat HIV testing during pregnancy and postpartum for PMTCTK01AI116298 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DRAKE, ALISON L · 2015 to 2019
$632k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981AHRQ HHS R01 HS025155NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI116298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on utilisation of in-facility second-trimester abortion services are sparse. We describe temporal and geographical trends in utilisation of in-facility second-trimester abortion services across Mexico.

methodsWe used 2007-2015 data from Mexico's Automated Hospital Discharge System (SAEH) to identify second-trimester abortive events (ICD O02-O08) in public hospitals across Mexico's 32 states. We described utilisation, calculated rates using population data, and used logistic regression to identify woman- and state-level factors (municipality-level marginalisation, state-level abortion law) associated with utilisation of second-trimester versus first-trimester services.

resultsWe identified 145 956 second-trimester abortions, or 13.4% of total documented hospitalizations for abortion between 2007 to 2015. The annual utilisation rate of second-trimester abortion remained constant, between 0.5 to 0.6 per 1000 women aged 15-44 years. Women living in highly marginalised municipalities had 1.43 higher odds of utilising abortions services in their second versus their first trimester, when compared with women in municipalities with low marginalisation (95% CI 1.18 to 1.73). Living in a state with a health or fetal anomaly exception to abortion restrictions was not associated with higher utilisation of second-trimester abortion services.

conclusionsOur results suggest there is a need for all types of second-trimester abortion services in Mexico. To improve health outcomes for Mexican women, especially the most vulnerable, access to safe second-trimester abortion services must be ensured through the implementation of current legal exceptions and renewed attention to the training of healthcare providers.

Indexed as

abortionepidemiologyreproductive health politicsservice deliverystatistics

Identifiers

PMID31413159
PMCPMC6892592
OpenAlexW2968023616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.