ReviewEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019
What can clinicians do to improve outcomes across psychiatric treatments: a conceptual review of non-specific components.
Review in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Efficacy of a peer-delivered group psychological intervention to reduce psychological distress among university students in India: a randomised controlled trial using an active control condition.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Trial
- Bridges to treatment satisfaction: the roles of trauma, social support, race and ethnicity among perinatal women receiving behavioural activation therapy.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Phenomenological-control framing of suggestion-based interventions: a testable hypothesis for acceptability and implementation in psychiatric care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Empathy and Mentalizing of Mental Health Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Observational
- Psychiatrists effect on positive symptom severity and daily functioning during pharmacotherapy for first-episode psychosis patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Remote consultations in primary care: Patient experiences and suggestions for improvement.Journal of health psychology · 2024Article
- WHAT DO PATIENTS THINK ABOUT PSYCHIATRIST'S ATTIRE? A CROATIAN STUDY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Article
- Features of immunometabolic depression as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcomes: pooled analysis of four clinical trials.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2024Article
- Developing a secure base in family intervention: using the adult attachment projective system to assess attachment in family relationships.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Exploring Black and South Asian women's experiences of help-seeking and engagement in perinatal mental health services in the UK.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Best practice model for outpatient psychiatric pharmacy practice, part 2: Confirmation of the attribute statements.The mental health clinician · 2022Article
- An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.Nature reviews psychology · 2022Article
- "There is Just a Different Energy": Changes in the Therapeutic Relationship with the Telehealth Transition.Clinical social work journal · 2022Article
- Parents' satisfaction with information received on psychotropic drugs used by adolescents in a Mental Health Unit.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2022Article
- Preferences for group arts therapies: a cross-sectional survey of mental health patients and the general population.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- The sociocultural and behavioural characteristics that patients want in psychiatrists: cross-sectional survey of patients' views.BJPsych bulletin · 2021Article
- The Importance of Patient Expectations: A Mixed-Methods Study of U.S. Psychiatrists.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPsychiatric treatments have specific and non-specific components. The latter has been addressed in an extensive literature on the placebo-effect in pharmacology and on common factors in psychotherapy. In the practice of mental health care, pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and social treatments are combined in complex interventions. This paper aims to review non-specific components across diverse psychiatric treatments and consider implications for practice and research.
methodsWe conducted a non-systematic review of non-specific components across psychiatric treatments, their impact on treatment processes and outcomes, and interventions to improve them.
resultsThe identified research is heterogeneous, both in design and quality. All non-specific components capture aspects of how clinicians communicate with patients. They are grouped into general verbal communication - focusing on initial contacts, empathy, clarity of communication, and detecting cues about unspoken concerns - non-verbal communication, the framing of treatments and decision-making. The evidence is stronger for the impact of these components on process measures - i.e. therapeutic relationship, treatment satisfaction and adherence than on clinical outcomes - i.e. symptoms and relapse. A small number of trials suggest that brief training courses and simple methods for structuring parts of clinical consultations can improve communication and subsequently clinical outcomes.
conclusionsMethodologically, rigorous research advancing current understandings of non-specific components may increase effectiveness across different treatments, potentially benefitting large numbers of patients. Brief training for clinicians and structuring clinical communication should be used more widely in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.