Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412942›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Evaluation of an HIV-specific rapid response service for community-based organisations in Ontario, Canada.

Michelle Camilleri, David Gogolishvili, Danielle L Giliauskas, Jason Globerman, Michael Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle CamilleriThe Ontario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1X3, Canada. mcamille1024@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-9773
David GogolishviliThe Ontario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1X3, Canada.
Danielle L GiliauskasThe Ontario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1X3, Canada.
Jason GlobermanThe Ontario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1X3, Canada.
Michael WilsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main St West, MML-417, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo support AIDS service organisations and other community-based organisations' use of research evidence to inform HIV-related programmes, services and policies, the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) developed a Rapid Response Service. The final product of the rapid response process at the OHTN, which is more streamlined than that of traditional systematic reviews, consists of a detailed report answering questions regarding an HIV-specific issue and how the findings apply within the local context. In 2016, the OHTN conducted an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of its Rapid Response Service. This article reports on the development of this service as well as the results of the evaluation.

methodsAll rapid responses published between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2016, by the OHTN (n = 102) were analysed using univariate analyses. Frequency distributions were determined for the following variables for each rapid response: populations observed, topics covered, requestor affiliations and number of downloads from the OHTN's website. Requestors of rapid responses were also interviewed regarding perceived helpfulness and utility of the service and final products, and suggestions for changes to the service. Six-month follow-up interviews were conducted to determine how affiliated organisations used the evidence from the rapid response they requested.

resultsThe 102 rapid responses published covered 14 different populations of interest. Topics covered included the HIV prevention, engagement and care cascade, determinants of health, syndemics, and comorbidities. Requestor affiliations consisted of AIDS service organisations, government agencies and policy-makers, non-HIV-focused community-based organisations, and hospitals, universities or health centres. Requestors perceived most aspects of the Rapid Response Service as very helpful and most frequently suggested that the rapid responses should provide recommendations. Follow-up interviews regarding the impact of rapid responses show that rapid responses have been used to assist organisations in numerous activities.

conclusionsOrganisations that have used the OHTN's Rapid Response Service describe it as a valuable service useful for the development of programmes and policies. Improvements in capacity-building efforts may increase its utility. Describing the findings of this evaluation may serve as a reference for similar programmes to increase the use of research evidence among public health decision-makers.

Indexed as

Public Health PracticeAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeCommunity Health ServicesCommunity ParticipationComorbidityContinuity of Patient CareEvidence-Based MedicineHIV InfectionsHumansInterinstitutional RelationsOntarioProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic FactorsAIDS service organisationscommunity organisationsHIVrapid reviewrapid synthesis

Identifiers

PMID31412942
PMCPMC6693275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.