Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412910›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Research, recruitment and observational data collection in care homes: lessons from the PACE study.

Danni Collingridge Moore, Sheila Payne, Lieve Van den Block, Maud Ten Koppel, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Katherine Froggatt, PACE (Palliative Care for Older People in care and nursing homes in Europe) Consortium

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ADVANCE: Methodology of a qualitative study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danni Collingridge MooreInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. d.collingridgemoore@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5861-8706
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lieve Van den BlockVUB-UGhent End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Maud Ten KoppelExpertise Center for Palliative Care, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katarzyna SzczerbińskaUnit for Research on Aging Society, Department of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Katherine FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
PACE (Palliative Care for Older People in care and nursing homes in Europe) Consortium

Funding

European Union's Seventh Framework Programme Grant agreement 603111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCare homes are a common place of death for older adults, especially those with complex health needs or dementia. Representative, internationally comparable data on care home facilities and their residents is needed to monitor health and wellbeing in this population. Identification and collection of data from care homes can be challenging and often underreported. This paper draws on the experiences of the PACE study, a cross sectional mortality follow back study conducted in six European countries.

resultsMultiple challenges were encountered in creating a sampling framework and contacting, recruiting and retaining care homes in the PACE study. Recruiting a randomly identified, representative cohort from a stratified sampling framework was problematic, as was engaging with care homes to ensure high response rates. Variation in the funding of care homes across the six countries involved in the study may explain the additional challenges encountered in England. Awareness of the challenges encountered in England in implementing an international study in care homes can inform the design and implementation of future studies within care homes. Further discussion is needed to determine the barriers and facilitators to conducting research in care homes, and how this is shaped by the focus of the study.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionDementiaEuropeFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNursing HomesPalliative CareResearch DesignSurvival RateCare homeEpidemiologyLong term care facilityNursing homeObservational studyPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID31412910
PMCPMC6694478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.