Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412885›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2019

New paradigm for stage III melanoma: from surgery to adjuvant treatment.

Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Lorenzo Borgognoni, Gerardo Botti, Michele Guida, Paolo Marchetti, Simone Mocellin, Paolo Muto, Giuseppe Palmieri, Roberto Patuzzo, Pietro Quaglino and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Targeting a scavenger receptor on tumor-associated macrophages activates tumor cell killing by natural killer cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo Antonio AsciertoUnit Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy. paolo.ascierto@gmail.com.
Lorenzo BorgognoniOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata and University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Gerardo BottiIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Michele GuidaUnit Melanoma and Rare Tumors, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiOncologia Medica B Policlinico Umberto I di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Simone MocellinSurgical Oncology Unit, IOV-IRCCS of Padova and Dept. Surgery Oncology Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Paolo MutoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe PalmieriUnit of Cancer Genetics, ICB-CNR, Sassari, Italy.
Roberto PatuzzoIRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Pietro QuaglinoDermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Ignazio StanganelliSkin Cancer Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, FC, Italy.
Corrado CaracòIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIstituto di Chimica Biomolecolare · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification has been introduced, and has attempted to define a more accurate and precise definition of prognosis in line with the major progresses in understanding the biology and pathogenesis of melanoma. This new staging system introduces major changes in the stage III staging system. Indeed, surgical practice is changing in stage III patients, since, according to recent evidence, there is no survival benefit in radical lymph node dissection following a positive sentinel lymph node dissection. Therefore, some patients currently staged IIIB-C after dissection could be downgraded to IIIA (as in the case of patients with metastatic non-sentinel lymph nodes) since many completion lymph node dissections will no longer be performed. Moreover, new and effective targeted and immune strategies are being introduced in the pharmacological armamentarium in the adjuvant setting, showing major efficacy.

conclusionsThis article provides the authors' personal view on the above-mentioned topics.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansLymphatic MetastasisMelanomaNeoplasm StagingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Adjuvant treatmentLymph node dissectionMelanomaStagingSurgery

Identifiers

PMID31412885
PMCPMC6693227
OpenAlexW2968412929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.