Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31412873›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) in a Norwegian population of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration compared to a control population.

Elma Jelin, Torbjørn Wisløff, Morten C Moe, Turid Heiberg

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elma JelinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. elmjel@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-9716
Torbjørn WisløffNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Postboks 222 Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Morten C MoeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Turid HeibergDepartment of Regional Research Support, Oslo University Hospital, Sogn Arena, POBox 4950, Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norsk Sykepleierforbund (NO) 15/0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are most widely used as outcomes in treatment of neovascular age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD), patient reported outcome measures are increasingly recognized. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) was developed to capture the perceived visual function. Yet, evidence of psychometric performance in the target population is required. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of NEI-VFQ 25 in a Norwegian cohort of newly diagnosed nAMD patients followed with a Treat and Extend (T/E) protocol.

methodsPatients receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection treatment according to a T/E protocol completed a Norwegian translation of NEI-VFQ 25, EuroQoL Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D), and Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS 5) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. In addition, a control population completed the same questionnaires. Visual acuity was assessed with LogMar for best/treated eye. Validity testing comprised face validity by a 0-10 numeric rating scale about relevance of NEI-VFQ 25 as well as regression analyses and correlations between NEI-VFQ 25 and other relevant variables. Reliability was examined with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency were performed. Responsiveness, discriminatory power and predictive value were also explored.

resultsNumber of respondents at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months was 197, 186, 176 and 168, respectively. The control population comprised 26 individuals. Face validity of NEI-VFQ 25 had a mean (SD) of 7.8 (1.7) (n = 84). NEI-VFQ was significantly correlated to visual acuity and PASS 5 as well as EQ-5D at baseline. Reliability (ICC) of the overall and sub scores for the patients/controls ranged from 0.49-0.97/0.59-0.97. Cronbach's alpha was 0.61-0.85. Discriminatory power was confirmed by significant differences of the overall score between controls and patients (P < 0.001). NEI-VFQ 25 indicates responsiveness showing overall score improved significantly (P ≤ 0.001) from baseline to 3 months. NEI-VFQ 25, general health and visual acuity at baseline were the strongest predictors for how patients reported vision after 6 months follow-up.

conclusionNEI-VFQ 25 showed acceptable psychometric performance, which supports that the Norwegian version can be used to monitor patients treated for nAMD.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleNorwayReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAge-related macular degenerationAnti-VEGFIntravitreal injectionsNEI-VFQ 25Patient reported outcome measuresQuestionnaireValidation

Identifiers

PMID31412873
PMCPMC6692950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.